1955
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-1809.1955.tb01348.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On Estimating the Relation Between Blood Group and Disease

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

10
1,132
0
22

Year Published

1971
1971
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2,570 publications
(1,174 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
10
1,132
0
22
Order By: Relevance
“…The correlation between two variables was measured by 'Pearson's r' . Association between CCG alleles and size of CAG allele was performed using Woolf's method 11 with correction according to Haldane. 12 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The correlation between two variables was measured by 'Pearson's r' . Association between CCG alleles and size of CAG allele was performed using Woolf's method 11 with correction according to Haldane. 12 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…is less biased by asymmetric sampling errors of small numbers than the expression which was derived by Woolf (1955), In (hK/kH). Haldane (1956) demonstrated that an unbiased and efiicient estimate oi p q was given by…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…24 We tested only the dominant genetic model (MM+MT vs. TT) because (i) the low frequency of homozygosity for high-risk alleles would yield a considerable number of studies with zero cell counts, generating unreliable OR estimates and (ii) the combination of MM and MT genotypes into one group was utilized in most primary studies included in our meta-analysis. The current strategy for analysis was consistent with that used in some previous studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%