1966
DOI: 10.15388/lmj.1966.19732
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On estimates of the remainder term in the central limit theorem

Abstract: The abstracts (in two languages) can be found in the pdf file of the article. Original author name(s) and title in Russian and Lithuanian: A. Бикялис. Оценки остаточного члена в центральной предельной теореме A. Bikelis. Liekamojo nario centrinėje ribinėje teoremoje įvertinimai

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

1984
1984
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…for all real z ě 0, where c nu is an absolute constant. Bikelis [2] extended this result to the case of non-iid X i 's. Nagaev's method involves the following essential components:…”
Section: Nonuniform Be Bounds: Nagaev's Results and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…for all real z ě 0, where c nu is an absolute constant. Bikelis [2] extended this result to the case of non-iid X i 's. Nagaev's method involves the following essential components:…”
Section: Nonuniform Be Bounds: Nagaev's Results and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The value of the truncation level y is chosen (i) to be large enough so that the tails of the truncated sum S pyq :" X pyq 1 `¨¨¨`X pyq n be close enough to those of S and, on the other hand, (ii) to be small enough so that the exponential tilt and the exponential inequality result in not too large a bound. In some variants, including the ones in [21,2], two different truncation levels are used.…”
Section: Nonuniform Be Bounds: Nagaev's Results and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By "universal constant" we mean that the constant is independent of P X 1 . Inequality (22) has been proven by Nagaev [14] and Bikelis [4] for λ = 3 and λ ∈ (2, 3], respectively. Meanwhile there exist several estimates for the constant C λ for λ ∈ (2, 3]; see [15] and references cited therein.…”
Section: Proofsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…These were improved to CnE|X 1 | 3 /(1 + |x| 3 ) by Nagaev (1965). Bikelis (1966) generalized Nagaev's result to…”
mentioning
confidence: 89%