2007
DOI: 10.1007/s11948-007-9038-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On Enrolling More Female Students in Science and Engineering

Abstract: Many people hold this truth to be self-evident that universities should enroll more female students in science and engineering; the main question then being how. Typical arguments include possible benefits to women, possible benefits to the economy, and the unfairness of the current female under-representation. However, when clearly stated and scrutinized these arguments in fact lead to the conclusion that there should be more women in scientific disciplines in higher education in the sense that we should expe… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
10
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The belief, that outreach practitioners develop constructivist practices that teachers do not have, has been identified as being based on vague justification, or assumption instead of hard facts (Bouville, 2008;Xie & Shauman, 2003). For the first time, outreach practitioners are compared with primary level teachers and the data reveals the belief that assuming outreach practitioners are more disposed to develop constructivist practices than teachers is fallacious.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The belief, that outreach practitioners develop constructivist practices that teachers do not have, has been identified as being based on vague justification, or assumption instead of hard facts (Bouville, 2008;Xie & Shauman, 2003). For the first time, outreach practitioners are compared with primary level teachers and the data reveals the belief that assuming outreach practitioners are more disposed to develop constructivist practices than teachers is fallacious.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, women-like men-should contribute in those fields where they can shine. As Bouville also states in Bouville (2008b), 'They should purport to allow women to graduate in a field congruent with her abilities and desires, rather than try to draw as many of them to scientific disciplines as possible'. These desires and abilities can be in engineering or not.…”
Section: Towards a More Balanced Engineeringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is simply not the case, Bouville's pronouncements to the contrary [2], that either researchers of underrepresentation, or managers of STEM intervention programs ''force'' anyone into fields. Instead, equity advocates assert that it is critical to ensure that these fields are open to the participation of women (and other underrepresented groups).…”
Section: Why More Women Don't Enroll In Science and Engineeringmentioning
confidence: 99%