2011
DOI: 10.1111/j.1552-6909.2011.01268.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On Electronic Fetal Monitoring Revisited

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
(14 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…took exception to Lowe () and with the assertion of Grimes and Piepert () that universal intrapartum EFM has failed to result in improved perinatal outcomes. They asserted that prior studies failing to demonstrate improved outcomes (Alfrevic, Devane, & Gyte, ) are “dated and limited” and pointed to more recent data demonstrating that “The benefits of intrapartal EFM clearly outweigh the benefits of intermittent auscultation (IA)” (Murray, Malmeister, Daniels, & Huelsmann, , p. 391).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…took exception to Lowe () and with the assertion of Grimes and Piepert () that universal intrapartum EFM has failed to result in improved perinatal outcomes. They asserted that prior studies failing to demonstrate improved outcomes (Alfrevic, Devane, & Gyte, ) are “dated and limited” and pointed to more recent data demonstrating that “The benefits of intrapartal EFM clearly outweigh the benefits of intermittent auscultation (IA)” (Murray, Malmeister, Daniels, & Huelsmann, , p. 391).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dr. Murray and colleagues () stated that the purpose of EFM is to “avoid fetal death” by identifying “its precursors” in time to intervene (i.e., deliver operatively). But this is exactly what EFM does least effectively, with high false positives and poor specificity.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%