The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.cor.2019.104783
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On electricity market equilibria with storage: Modeling, uniqueness, and a distributed ADMM

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Storage participation models vary across U.S. markets, although recent FERC 841 orders establish common requirements (Sakti et al 2018). From an implementation perspective, increased penetration of storage assets and VRE raises the possibility of multiple potential market equilibria (Grübel et al 2020;Schmalensee 2019). Grübel et al (2020) find that computation of market equilibria is much more challenging with storage because of the interlinkage of trading events over time, and develop computational methods to quickly solve such optimization problems using the alternating direction method of multipliers.…”
Section: Participation Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Storage participation models vary across U.S. markets, although recent FERC 841 orders establish common requirements (Sakti et al 2018). From an implementation perspective, increased penetration of storage assets and VRE raises the possibility of multiple potential market equilibria (Grübel et al 2020;Schmalensee 2019). Grübel et al (2020) find that computation of market equilibria is much more challenging with storage because of the interlinkage of trading events over time, and develop computational methods to quickly solve such optimization problems using the alternating direction method of multipliers.…”
Section: Participation Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From an implementation perspective, increased penetration of storage assets and VRE raises the possibility of multiple potential market equilibria (Grübel et al 2020;Schmalensee 2019). Grübel et al (2020) find that computation of market equilibria is much more challenging with storage because of the interlinkage of trading events over time, and develop computational methods to quickly solve such optimization problems using the alternating direction method of multipliers. More generally, current U.S. markets differ in how and if they manage intertemporal constraints for ES and demand-side resources.…”
Section: Participation Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies where equilibria of electricity markets are evaluated, taking into account peer-to-peer energy exchanges or the storage of energy by the operators, have also been analyzed [21,22]. A network of prosumers has been considered having price differentiation in their preferences and considering two cases where a centralized market design was used as a benchmark or a distributed peer-to-peer market design is developed [21].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A network of prosumers has been considered having price differentiation in their preferences and considering two cases where a centralized market design was used as a benchmark or a distributed peer-to-peer market design is developed [21]. Discussions where other solutions for the peer-to-peer market design may exist and works related to the electricity storage have already been presented as a generalized Nash equilibrium for the problem, illustrating the approach for a three-node network and the IEEE 14-bus network [21,22]. The problem of electricity market equilibria with storage modeling was also analyzed in [22].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation