1964
DOI: 10.1007/bf01386087
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On eigenvalues of matrices dependent on a parameter

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
122
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 252 publications
(128 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
4
122
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this case, the formula for the second derivative of λ max can be found, for example, in [17] and (less explicitly) in [16]. If, on the other hand, the maximum eigenvalue of X has multiplicity r > 1, the maximum eigenvalue function is smooth near X only if it is restricted to the submanifold of S n consisting of matrices whose maximum eigenvalue has multiplicity r. Thus, the key idea for second-order methods is to model the second-order behaviour of the maximum eigenvalue function on such a manifold.…”
Section: A Second-order Methods To Minimize Fmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this case, the formula for the second derivative of λ max can be found, for example, in [17] and (less explicitly) in [16]. If, on the other hand, the maximum eigenvalue of X has multiplicity r > 1, the maximum eigenvalue function is smooth near X only if it is restricted to the submanifold of S n consisting of matrices whose maximum eigenvalue has multiplicity r. Thus, the key idea for second-order methods is to model the second-order behaviour of the maximum eigenvalue function on such a manifold.…”
Section: A Second-order Methods To Minimize Fmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By Lemma 3.2 all eigenvalues in S out are semisimple and hence differentiable with respect to s [7,Theorem 6]. Consider an eigenvalue λ ∈ S out for an arbitrary s. Since λ is real, the corresponding eigenspace of L(s) has a real basis.…”
Section: Eigenvaluesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For a given ε, we have k (t) = (ε 2 + 1) dλ ε dt − 1 = 0 at the optimum t. We can differentiate both sides with respect to t and solve for dε dt to get (19). The formula for λ ε can be found in [24,25,31], i.e. using…”
Section: Corollary 1 the Derivativesmentioning
confidence: 99%