2017
DOI: 10.1007/s10955-017-1832-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On Edge Exchangeable Random Graphs

Abstract: We study a recent model for edge exchangeable random graphs introduced by Crane and Dempsey; in particular we study asymptotic properties of the random simple graph obtained by merging multiple edges. We study a number of examples, and show that the model can produce dense, sparse and extremely sparse random graphs. One example yields a power-law degree distribution. We give some examples where the random graph is dense and converges a.s. in the sense of graph limit theory, but also an example where a.s. every… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Remark 5. The above Poisson-Dirichlet universality convergence can be rephrased in the theory of edge exchangeable random graphs as the convergence towards the rank 1 multigraph driven by the Poisson-Dirichlet partition, see [17,Example 7.1 and 7.8] and [12].…”
Section: Number Of Verticesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Remark 5. The above Poisson-Dirichlet universality convergence can be rephrased in the theory of edge exchangeable random graphs as the convergence towards the rank 1 multigraph driven by the Poisson-Dirichlet partition, see [17,Example 7.1 and 7.8] and [12].…”
Section: Number Of Verticesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Random-walk models generate networks one edge at a time; this specification of a graph may be viewed as a sequence of edges. Recent work on so-called edge exchangeable graphs (Crane and Dempsey, 2017;Williamson, 2016;Cai et al, 2016;Janson, 2017) define network models in terms of an exchangeable sequence of edges. Edges in random-walk models are not exchangeable.…”
Section: Relationship To Preferential Attachment and Other Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A graphon can encode any fixed pattern on some number n of vertices, but this pattern then occurs on every possible subgraph of size n with fixed probability. (b)Configuration models are popular in probability (because of their simplicity) but have limited use in statistics unless the quantity of interest is the degree sequence itself: they are ‘maximally random’ given the degrees, in a manner similar to exponential families being maximally random given a sufficient statistic, and are thus insensitive to any structure that is not captured by the degrees. Other models based on degrees (PA models, the model of Caron and Fox () and so‐called rank 1 edge exchangeable models (Janson, )) are similarly constrained.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another class of attempts suggests to completely give up on the node label exchangeability requirement, and to consider edge exchangeability instead, e.g., using variations of Pitman–Yor processes [ 36 , 37 , 38 ]. It remains unclear at present whether these developments imply that too many network models that were found to be quite useful in practice and that do use node labels , are statistically hopeless.…”
Section: Impasse With Sparsitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Already several works have addressed this problem [ 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 ], using different approaches such as relaxing the condition but always characterizing models with average degree diverging with the network size N , considering edge exchangeable models or alternatively using an embedding space as a basic mechanism to combine sparsity with projectivity and exchangeability [ 31 , 39 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%