1956
DOI: 10.1080/21674086.1956.11926024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On Earliest Memories

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1960
1960
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, it is not entirely uncommon to encounter clients who remember events that occurred at the age of two. Saul et al (1956) maintain that first memories are sometimes accurate, sometimes distorted and sometimes consist of hearsay:…”
Section: Use Of Early Memories: Brief Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it is not entirely uncommon to encounter clients who remember events that occurred at the age of two. Saul et al (1956) maintain that first memories are sometimes accurate, sometimes distorted and sometimes consist of hearsay:…”
Section: Use Of Early Memories: Brief Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mayman (1968) claimed that "early memories may be analyzed as if they were fantasized representations of self and others, rather than as factual accounts of a few scattered events in a person's life" (p. 315). Saul, Snyder, and Sheppard (1956) were unequivocal in their claims about the usefulness of earliest or first memories: "They reveal, probably more clearly than any other single psychological datum, the central core of each person's psychodynamics, his chief motivations, form of neurosis, and emotional problem" (p. 228).…”
Section: A Brief Review Of the Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Schachtel (1947) tried to reconcile Bartlett's ( 1932) constructivist notion of memory processing with what has been called Freud's "selective reconstruction model" of repression (White and Pillemer, 1979). It has been compared by some analytic writers (e.g., Saul et al, 1956) to the repression of unacceptable drives and their derivatives. It has been compared by some analytic writers (e.g., Saul et al, 1956) to the repression of unacceptable drives and their derivatives.…”
Section: Se Ivetzler-ja Siseeneymentioning
confidence: 99%