1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0928-2009(98)80149-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On ductile rupture criteria for structural tear in the case of ship collision and grounding

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Using the deviatoric strain tensor, the von Mises equivalent strain ε eq can be defined using the deviatoric strain tensor as shown in Eq. (6). By subtracting the elastic strain from the total von Mises equivalent strain, the von Mises equivalent plastic strain ε p.eq can be obtained.…”
Section: Constant Failure Strain Criterionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Using the deviatoric strain tensor, the von Mises equivalent strain ε eq can be defined using the deviatoric strain tensor as shown in Eq. (6). By subtracting the elastic strain from the total von Mises equivalent strain, the von Mises equivalent plastic strain ε p.eq can be obtained.…”
Section: Constant Failure Strain Criterionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By examining trends in the marine industry, Lehmann and Yu [6] proposed a new fracture criterion called the rupture index. The rupture index is based on continuum damage mechanics (CDM) theory.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hancock and Mackenzie (1976) proved how the stress triaxility has an effect on the failure via tests of tensile specimens with a series of notches. Lehmann and Yu (1998) suggested a rupture index governed by the stress triaxility using continuum damage mechanics (CDM) wherein damage growth is defined as the function of stress triaxility. In the failure criteria of RTCL (Rice-Tracey and Cockcroft-Latham) presented by Urban (2003) and Törnqvist (2003), it was assumed that the growth of stress triaxility governs the failure of material under the tensile condition.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For a low alloy carbon steel (St52-3 steel), the failure parameter was estimated to 0.7. Lehmann and Yu (1998) applied this failure criterion in the finite element modeling of the quasi static penetration test of stiffened double plate ship bottom, showing a good agreement with experimental results. Broekhuijsen (2003) also calibrated experimentally the rupture index of mild steel to model numerically the punching tests of 12 mm thick plates so giving a good prediction of failure when compared with experimental tests and demonstrating a good performance when material is subjected to various stresses states (ISSC, 2006).…”
Section: Triaxial Stress State Based Failure Criteriamentioning
confidence: 55%
“…A ductile failure criterion in naval structures that takes into account the triaxial state of stresses in fractured material was suggested by Lehmann and Yu (1998). It is based on the continuum damage mechanics and it adopts a rupture index I R as a critical damage parameter which governs material damage evolution until the rupture (Servis and Samuelides, 2006).…”
Section: Triaxial Stress State Based Failure Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%