1977
DOI: 10.1112/plms/s3-35.3.425
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On Divisors of Fermat, Fibonacci, Lucas, and Lehmer Numbers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
75
0
1

Year Published

1995
1995
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
75
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This follows immediately from Lemmas 6 and 7 of Stewart [18], using (1). n It is by means of this lemma that we obtain Thue equations.…”
Section: Some Preliminary Lemmasmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…This follows immediately from Lemmas 6 and 7 of Stewart [18], using (1). n It is by means of this lemma that we obtain Thue equations.…”
Section: Some Preliminary Lemmasmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…Il est cependant aÁ noter, comme le fait Tenenbaum dans [19] (p. 10), que la pre sence des termes ne gatifs dans (1) (ou dans (17)) ajoute une difficulte supple mentaire. Pour surmonter cette difficulte , nous sommes amene s aÁ montrer que la quantite p D$( pÂz&0, p, z) est suffisamment petite relativement aÁ D$(x, y, z) pour qu'elle puisse e^tre conside re e comme jouant un ro^le ne gligeable dans l'e quation (17). Pour montrer que p D$( pÂz&0, p, z)ÂD$(x, y, z) est petit (en fait 0(1Âu log :…”
Section: Minoration De D$(x Z) Et Pr$(x)unclassified
“…where P is prime; moreover, the second case occurs precisely when a = P α z(P ) and b = P β z(P ) for some exponents β > α 0 (see the remarks preceding [13,Lemma 6]). So if a and b are both squarefree and Φ a (10) and Φ b (10) are not coprime, then a = z(P ) and b = P z(P ) for some prime P > 5 for which z(P ) is squarefree.…”
Section: Proof Of Lemmamentioning
confidence: 98%