2020
DOI: 10.1007/s10409-020-00965-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On dissipative gradient effect in higher-order strain gradient plasticity: the modelling of surface passivation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Besides, with the increase of indentation depth, the elastic modulus and hardness of most cured monomers and their composites are not constant but increase gradually with the decrease of load (indenter displacement) within a certain range (as shown in Figure S2a,b). This phenomenon, called the size effect of nanoindentation, can be explained by the strain gradient plasticity theory developed based on the molecular kinking mechanism. , Its size effect is mainly caused by size-related deformation. The degree of size-dependent deformation is affected by the bending stiffness, molecular weight, crosslinking density, and flexibility of the polymer molecular chain.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Besides, with the increase of indentation depth, the elastic modulus and hardness of most cured monomers and their composites are not constant but increase gradually with the decrease of load (indenter displacement) within a certain range (as shown in Figure S2a,b). This phenomenon, called the size effect of nanoindentation, can be explained by the strain gradient plasticity theory developed based on the molecular kinking mechanism. , Its size effect is mainly caused by size-related deformation. The degree of size-dependent deformation is affected by the bending stiffness, molecular weight, crosslinking density, and flexibility of the polymer molecular chain.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This phenomenon, called the size effect of nanoindentation, can be explained by the strain gradient plasticity theory developed based on the molecular kinking mechanism. 42,43 Its size effect is mainly caused by sizerelated deformation. The degree of size-dependent deformation is affected by the bending stiffness, molecular weight, crosslinking density, and flexibility of the polymer molecular chain.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…通过上式即可拟合细丝扭转的实验数据。Liu 等人 [116] 对 Chen-Wang [114] 以及 Aifantis [112] 的应变梯度塑性理论进行 了上述同样的讨论。将这 3 种应变梯度塑性理论与扭转结果进行比较,发现 Fleck-Hutchinson 和 Chen-Wang 模型 能够预测扭转时细丝屈服强度的升高,而 Aifantis 模型却不能预测该尺寸效应。Liu 等人 [116] 认为这与 Aifantis 模 型的应变依赖性有关。同时,这 3 种模型的材料内在特征尺寸参数 l 不仅需要通过实验数据来确定,还与模型中 的参数有关(如 Fleck-Hutchinson 模型中的耦合系数 μ) 。 基于前人的工作,许多学者对细丝扭转问题进行了进一步的研究。Ban 等人 [117] 在传统 SGP 理论基础上,提 出了一种改进的增量本构模型,以表征微金属材料中尺寸和损伤的耦合效应。该模型考虑了小应变和各向同性损 伤的假设,包含了服役过程中的变形损伤对弹性模量、塑性屈服准则和材料内在特征尺寸的影响。他们应用新的 修正理论分析了细铜丝扭转的实验结果,表明理论预测与实验测量结果吻合较好。Liu 等人 [118] 研究了材料固有长 度尺度的塑性应变依赖性的 3 种不同关系,并将该理论应用于丝材扭转测试。通过比较现有的和新建立的本构方 程,他们发现一个逐渐减小的材料内在特征尺寸参数比恒定的材料内在特征尺寸参数对丝材的扭矩有更好的预测。 作者还讨论了泰勒位错规则及其对推导本构方程的影响。Ding 等人 [119] 讨论了铜微米丝的尺寸依赖性扭转变形, 并提出了基于 Gudmundson 高阶 SGP 理论热力学框架 [109] 的增量式高阶 SGP 本构模型来描述这一现象。该模型引 入了一种新的随动硬化演化规则,考虑了样品和晶粒的尺寸对塑性硬化的耦合效应。有限元仿真结果表明,该模 型能够准确捕捉铜微米丝尺寸相关的扭转变形。Hua 等人 [120]…”
unclassified