2013
DOI: 10.4208/cicp.120712.281212a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On Diffuse Interface Modeling and Simulation of Surfactants in Two-Phase Fluid Flow

Abstract: An existing phase-field model of two immiscible fluids with a single soluble surfactant present is discussed in detail. We analyze the well-posedness of the model and provide strong evidence that it is mathematically ill-posed for a large set of physically relevant parameters. As a consequence, critical modifications to the model are suggested that substantially increase the domain of validity. Carefully designed numerical simulations offer informative demonstrations as to the sharpness of our theoretical resu… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
103
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(106 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
2
103
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The enthalpic contribution f e (φ) = φ 2 /2 expresses that presence of the surfactant is energetically penalized in the bulk liquids, while the surface delta function δ S (φ) can be regularized on several fashions for continuum models. 26 In agreement with the results of our previous works 9 we choose δ S (φ) = g(φ) resulting in broadening interface with increasing surfactant composition. In the surfactant-free case (i.e.…”
Section: Theorysupporting
confidence: 81%
“…The enthalpic contribution f e (φ) = φ 2 /2 expresses that presence of the surfactant is energetically penalized in the bulk liquids, while the surface delta function δ S (φ) can be regularized on several fashions for continuum models. 26 In agreement with the results of our previous works 9 we choose δ S (φ) = g(φ) resulting in broadening interface with increasing surfactant composition. In the surfactant-free case (i.e.…”
Section: Theorysupporting
confidence: 81%
“…The logarithmic term in F ψ is the ideal part of the entropy of mixing, while the term −w(c/2)ψ 2 represents the energy associated with the lateral interaction between adjacent surfactant layers [17]. F 1 is a general linear coupling between the liquid-liquid interface and the surfactant field, emerging from the regularization of the surface Diracdelta function [20]. Finally, F ex accounts for the extra energy due to the presence of the surfactant in the bulk phases [17].…”
Section: A Free Energy Functionalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, F ex accounts for the extra energy due to the presence of the surfactant in the bulk phases [17]. Contrary to the work of Engblom et al [20], we do not consider a coupling term ∝ ψ[φ(1 − φ)] in F 1 , since it is equivalent to ∝ ψ φ 2 in F ex . Note that the only asymmetric term of the free energy functional is −w e φ ψ, being responsible for different equilibrium mole fractions of the surfactant in the bulk phases.…”
Section: A Free Energy Functionalmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The level set method, which describes the interface as the level set of a function, was considered in [43]. Numerical computations based on diffuse interface models have been presented in [35,42,24,26]. The immersed boundary method has been used in [34,15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%