2002
DOI: 10.1162/089976602760805296
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On Different Facets of Regularization Theory

Abstract: This review provides a comprehensive understanding of regularization theory from different perspectives, emphasizing smoothness and simplicity principles. Using the tools of operator theory and Fourier analysis, it is shown that the solution of the classical Tikhonov regularization problem can be derived from the regularized functional defined by a linear differential (integral) operator in the spatial (Fourier) domain. State-of-the-art research relevant to the regularization theory is reviewed, covering Occam… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
87
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 113 publications
(89 citation statements)
references
References 88 publications
1
87
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Usually these measures are used to build bounds driving model selection, and may serve as regularization terms in a structural risk minimization approach. An overview of these and other regularization related topics is given in Mulier 2007, Chen andHaykin 2002). Less work has been done on measuring the behavioral of a model directly.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Usually these measures are used to build bounds driving model selection, and may serve as regularization terms in a structural risk minimization approach. An overview of these and other regularization related topics is given in Mulier 2007, Chen andHaykin 2002). Less work has been done on measuring the behavioral of a model directly.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The adopted Tikhonov regularization framework [34][35][36][37] is one of the most common forms of regularization. It minimizes an energy function in an RKHS H to regularize a function f , and can be written as:…”
Section: Transformation Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over some time, learning tasks based on the ERM principle may be ill-posed in science and engineering areas because there may be infinite hypotheses that satisfy the constraints [37] and even slight perturbations to the parameters of the model lead to very different solutions [34]. The principle of minimizing the errors on a training dataset is not self-evident, and another inductive principle and algorithms with higher generalization ability are required.…”
Section: Structural Risk Function Minimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%