1991
DOI: 10.1016/0022-5096(91)90012-d
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On diagonal and elastic symmetry of the approximate effective stiffness tensor of heterogeneous media

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
93
0
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 187 publications
(98 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
4
93
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The assumption of uniform mean stress was described as reasonable for bi-phase composite and composites with ideal uniform random orientation of inclusions [4,6,24]. The results shown in previous section are in good agreement with this conclusion.…”
Section: 3) Mori-tanaka Formulation and Pgmt For Non-uniform Distrisupporting
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The assumption of uniform mean stress was described as reasonable for bi-phase composite and composites with ideal uniform random orientation of inclusions [4,6,24]. The results shown in previous section are in good agreement with this conclusion.…”
Section: 3) Mori-tanaka Formulation and Pgmt For Non-uniform Distrisupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Mori-Tanaka and self-consistent schemes were shown by Benveniste et al, [4] to yield a symmetric effective stiffness tensor, only if the composite had reinforcements of similar shape and alignment. Weng [5] noticed that the Mori-Tanaka approach in multi-phase composites could violate the Hashin -Shtrikman bounds.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As is well known (Benveniste et al, 1991;Qu and Cherkaoui, 2007;Lester et al, 2011;Dvorak, 2013;Hossain et al, 2015) the effective stiffness tensor of a composite material with M different types of inhomogeneities can be expressed in terms of the stiffness tensors of the constituent materials, their corresponding volume fraction and the global strain concentration tensor through the equation…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The L FM in the above expression is provided in a global coordinate system, while c r denotes the total volume fraction of the r-th inhomogeneity. Among others, Norris (1989);Ferrari (1991); Benveniste et al (1991); Christensen et al (1992); Schjødt-Thomsen and Pyrz (2001); Dvorak (2013), discuss the restrictions on constituent shape alignment in the application of equation (31). As discussed in these references, for general ellipsoidal fiber shape the obtained macroscopic tensor L SMC may not be symmetric and proper regularization is required for symmetrize it.…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, the application of traditional scale transition models such as Mori-Tanaka or Eshelby-Kröner self-consistent models to the case of multi-phase materials containing heterogeneities of different shapes does not simultaneously satisfy all these five fundamental criteria. It often occurs that the first three criteria are not fulfilled [5,9].…”
Section: Normalized Self-consistent Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%