2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.physletb.2017.08.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On determinant representation and integrability of Nekrasov functions

Abstract: Conformal blocks and their AGT relations to LMNS integrals and Nekrasov functions are best described by "conformal" (or Dotsenko-Fateev) matrix models, but in non-Gaussian Dijkgraaf-Vafa phases, where different eigenvalues are integrated along different contours. In such matrix models, the determinant representations and integrability are restored only after a peculiar Fourier transform in the numbers of integrations. From the point of view of conformal blocks, this is Fourier transform w.r.t. the intermediate… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 91 publications
(122 reference statements)
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore it is unlikely that it can be derived following the geometrical approach connecting quantum curves and Painlevé equations developed in[40]. On the other hand this model seems to fit a bit more naturally into the approach of[41,42] even though in the latter one makes contact with the electric frame and not with the magnetic one which is instead the correct frame for the model (2.8).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore it is unlikely that it can be derived following the geometrical approach connecting quantum curves and Painlevé equations developed in[40]. On the other hand this model seems to fit a bit more naturally into the approach of[41,42] even though in the latter one makes contact with the electric frame and not with the magnetic one which is instead the correct frame for the model (2.8).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Determinants and pfaffians. Another approach to the Isomonodromy/CFT correspondence was proposed in [MM17]. It was argued in loc.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that Hence, the double scaling limit of ξ n±1 is given by Note that the value ofc, introduced in (4. 35), is irrelevant to this order.…”
Section: Double Scaling Limit and Painlevé II Equationmentioning
confidence: 98%