2016
DOI: 10.3847/0004-637x/819/2/119
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On Detecting Halo Assembly Bias With Galaxy Populations

Abstract: The fact that the clustering of dark matter halos depends not only on their mass, but also the formation epoch, is a prominent, albeit subtle, feature of the cold dark matter structure formation theory, and is known as assembly bias. At low mass scales (∼ 10 12 h −1 M ⊙ ), early-forming halos are predicted to be more strongly clustered than the late-forming ones. In this study we aim to robustly detect the signature of assembly bias observationally, making use of formation time indicators of central galaxies i… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
116
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 118 publications
(119 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
(116 reference statements)
3
116
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Observational studies of assembly bias have generally produced mixed results. There have been several suggestive detections in observations (Berlind et al 2006;Yang et al 2006;Tinker et al 2008bTinker et al , 2017bWang et al 2008Wang et al , 2013bCooper et al 2010;Lacerna et al 2014a;Hearin et al 2015;Watson et al 2015;Miyatake et al 2016;Saito et al 2016;Zentner et al 2016;Montero-Dorta et al 2017;Tojeiro et al 2017), while numerous other studies indicate the impact of assembly bias to be small (Abbas & Sheth 2006;Blanton & Berlind 2007;Croton & Farrar 2008;Tinker et al 2008aTinker et al , 2011Deason et al 2013;Lacerna et al 2014b;Lin et al 2016;Vakili & Hahn 2016;Dvornik et al 2017). The situation is further complicated as various systematic effects can mimic the effects of assembly bias (e.g., Campbell et al 2015;Busch & White 2017;Lacerna et al 2017;Sin et al 2017;Tinker et al 2017a;Zu & Mandelbaum 2017) and the evidence for assembly bias to date remains inconclusive and controversial.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Observational studies of assembly bias have generally produced mixed results. There have been several suggestive detections in observations (Berlind et al 2006;Yang et al 2006;Tinker et al 2008bTinker et al , 2017bWang et al 2008Wang et al , 2013bCooper et al 2010;Lacerna et al 2014a;Hearin et al 2015;Watson et al 2015;Miyatake et al 2016;Saito et al 2016;Zentner et al 2016;Montero-Dorta et al 2017;Tojeiro et al 2017), while numerous other studies indicate the impact of assembly bias to be small (Abbas & Sheth 2006;Blanton & Berlind 2007;Croton & Farrar 2008;Tinker et al 2008aTinker et al , 2011Deason et al 2013;Lacerna et al 2014b;Lin et al 2016;Vakili & Hahn 2016;Dvornik et al 2017). The situation is further complicated as various systematic effects can mimic the effects of assembly bias (e.g., Campbell et al 2015;Busch & White 2017;Lacerna et al 2017;Sin et al 2017;Tinker et al 2017a;Zu & Mandelbaum 2017) and the evidence for assembly bias to date remains inconclusive and controversial.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…We quantify density by the distance to the fifth nearest neighbor, but using a smoothed galaxy overdensity gives similar results. The trend that galaxies born in overdense environments form earlier holds for all stellar masses, and is a manifestation of the earlier collapse times of halos in overdense regions, known as "assembly bias" (Gao et al 2005;Wechsler et al 2006;Croton et al 2007;Dalal et al 2008;Zentner et al 2014;Lin et al 2016;Miyatake et al 2016;Tinker et al 2016, see also the arguments in Dressler 1980, and Kelson et al 2016. The environment at earlier and later redshifts shows similar relations with t peak , but the correlation weakens at late ( < z 1) and very early (z > 4) redshifts.…”
Section: The Galaxy-halo Connectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is scatter in the assignment of halo mass to groups, leading to uncertainties in the halo masses. Also, there are errors in the identification of central galaxies (e.g., Skibba et al 2011;Lin et al 2016;Lange et al 2018). To explore how these two errors impact our results, we employ a mock catalog built by Campbell et al (2015).…”
Section: Impact Of Imperfect Group Catalogsmentioning
confidence: 99%