1916
DOI: 10.1037/h0071742
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On descriptive analysis of manifest delusions from the subject's point of view.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1916
1916
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In 1916 Southard (87,88) made the suggestion that standard grammatical terminology may be used in describing psychopathological conditions, often with more descriptive adequacy than that yielded by existing psychiatric language. The patient's subjective relationship with his environment, Southard suggests, can be clearly depicted in terms of grammatical mood, voice, etc.…”
Section: Speech In Psychopathologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 1916 Southard (87,88) made the suggestion that standard grammatical terminology may be used in describing psychopathological conditions, often with more descriptive adequacy than that yielded by existing psychiatric language. The patient's subjective relationship with his environment, Southard suggests, can be clearly depicted in terms of grammatical mood, voice, etc.…”
Section: Speech In Psychopathologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Maher claims a series of case studies published by Southard (Southard: 1912;1915;1916) establishes the biopathological basis of the patient's anomalous experience (Maher: 2003a, 21). He cites two of these cases.…”
Section: Maher's Arguments I) the Anomalous Experiencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately for the patients, this vindication of their descriptions of their experiences did not generally occur until autopsy revealed the truth. Southard's approach is well exemplified in one of his many articles (Southard, 1916) on the role of the patient's experience in the genesis of delusions.…”
Section: The Anomalous-experience Hypothesismentioning
confidence: 99%