2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.ipl.2012.06.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On deriving conditional diagnosability of interconnection networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To the best of out knowledge, there is no existing work on this topic. It is motivated by the conditional diagnosability of some graphs [3,4,30,34,37,40]. Zhou et al [34,37] have proposed the conditional diagnosability of hierarchical hypercubes and crossed cubes under the comparison model, respectively.…”
Section: Motivations and Goalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To the best of out knowledge, there is no existing work on this topic. It is motivated by the conditional diagnosability of some graphs [3,4,30,34,37,40]. Zhou et al [34,37] have proposed the conditional diagnosability of hierarchical hypercubes and crossed cubes under the comparison model, respectively.…”
Section: Motivations and Goalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Xu et al [30] investigated the conditional diagnosability of shuffle-cube under the PMC model, while they did not consider the conditional diagnosability under the comparison model. Cheng et al [3,4] gave a unified approach to explore the conditional diagnosability of a class of interconnection networks, but it does not contain the shuffle-cube. Zhu et al [40] determined the relationship among diagnosability, strong diagnosability and conditional diagnosability of strong networks.…”
Section: Motivations and Goalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on this assumption, Lai et al [2005] introduced the concept of conditional diagnosability and showed that the conditional diagnosability of an ndimensional hypercube Q n is 4n − 7 for n ≥ 5 under the PMC model. Several studies also contributed to the conditional diagnosability of multiprocessor systems under both the PMC and MM* models, including hypercubes [Hsu et al 2009;Lai et al 2005], star graphs [Chang and Hsieh 2014;Cheng et al 2012;Lin et al 2008], k-ary n-cubes Hsieh and Kao 2013], Bijective Connection (BC) networks Xu et al 2009;Zhu 2008], Cayley graphs (only in the MM* model) [Lin et al 2008], and folded hypercubes (PMC) . In this article, we evaluate the conditional diagnosability for n under the PMC model and show it is 4n − 11 for n ≥ 4.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Others evaluated the conditional diagnosability of multiprocessor systems under both the PMC and MM* models, including hypercubes [22], [27], k-ary n-cubes [5], [21], Bijective Connection (BC) networks [23], [40], [49], Cayley graphs (only in the MM* model) [32], and folded hypercubes (PMC) [50]. Cheng et al [6] and Lin et al [32] have shown that the conditional diagnosability of S n is 3n À 7 for n ! 4 under the MM* model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%