2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.08.031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On-demand service platforms pro/anti adoption cognition: Examining the context-specific reasons

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
17
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 94 publications
(111 reference statements)
2
17
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The perception of uncertainty and potential risks that may accompany the adoption of shared consumption practice. responsiveness also positively impacts consumer adoption intention (Delgosha & Hajiheydari, 2020;Nisar et al, 2019). Meanwhile, low entry barriers, lower complexity and ease of operation attract providers to share their idle resources for optimum usage in sharing economy (Batle et al, 2020;Lang et al, 2019;Zhang et al, 2019).…”
Section: Risk Barriersmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The perception of uncertainty and potential risks that may accompany the adoption of shared consumption practice. responsiveness also positively impacts consumer adoption intention (Delgosha & Hajiheydari, 2020;Nisar et al, 2019). Meanwhile, low entry barriers, lower complexity and ease of operation attract providers to share their idle resources for optimum usage in sharing economy (Batle et al, 2020;Lang et al, 2019;Zhang et al, 2019).…”
Section: Risk Barriersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…People espouse shared consumption for its flexibility and convenience (Lamberton & Rose, 2012; Park & Armstrong, 2019a; Zhang et al, 2019). Moreover, while the quality of service, superior functionality, website usability and information quality ameliorate the perception of intermediary platforms, providers' responsiveness also positively impacts consumer adoption intention (Delgosha & Hajiheydari, 2020; Nisar et al, 2019). Meanwhile, low entry barriers, lower complexity and ease of operation attract providers to share their idle resources for optimum usage in sharing economy (Batle et al, 2020;Lang et al, 2019; Zhang et al, 2019).…”
Section: Thematic Content Analysis and Synthesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the relevance of different technologies over existing models, past research has assessed the adoption of different types of disruptive technologies with a transformative focus, such as the autonomous vehicles ( Manfreda et al., 2021 ), internet of things ( Ben Arfi et al., 2021b ), artificial intelligence ( Pillai et al., 2020 ), blockchain ( Queiroz and Fosso Wamba, 2019 ), Voice-based digital assistants ( Vimalkumar et al., 2021 ), Digital payment ( Balakrishnan and Shuib, 2021 ), mobile payment ( Patil et al., 2020 ), mobile health applications ( Alam et al., 2020 ), Digital Personal Data Stores ( Mariani et al., 2021 ), On-Demand Service Platforms ( Delgosha and Hajiheydari, 2020 ), Business Intelligence and Analytics ( Jaklič et al., 2018 ), social assistive technology ( Khaksar et al., 2021 ), virtual reality ( Kunz and Santomier, 2019 ), besides others considering also varied organizational configurations, as government ( Hujran et al., 2020 ), hospitals ( Rahman et al., 2016 ), schools ( Guggemos and Seufert, 2021 ), retail stores ( Pillai et al., 2020 ) and banks ( Hu et al., 2019 ).…”
Section: Digital Transformation and Technology Adoption Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Today, the main approaches to the regulation of public and private digital platforms are to establish special rules or amend the current legislation that considers the specifics of digital platforms. In France, the Tax Code was amended and supplemented with the rules that set several obligations of the enterprise as a platform operator (the operator is obliged, with each transaction, to provide accurate, clear, and transparent information about the tax and social obligations of the persons who carry out the transaction through the platform) (Delgosha & Hajiheydari, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%