2014
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.90.155438
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On-demand maximally entangled states with a parity meter and continuous feedback

Abstract: Generating on-demand maximally entangled states is one of the corner stones for quantum information processing. Parity measurements can serve to create Bell states and have been implemented via an electronic Mach-Zehnder interferometer among others. However, the entanglement generation is necessarily harmed by measurement induced dephasing processes in one of the two parity subspace. In this work, we propose two different schemes of continuous feedback for a parity measurement. They enable us to avoid both the… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A possible route to perform QEC without the overhead of ancilla qubits is to directly monitor the error syndromes continuously in time [22,23]. With this variation, the code subspaces for the error syndromes are directly coupled to a continuous readout device [24][25][26][27][28][29][30], avoiding the need for periodic entangling gates and additional ancilla measurements. This idea of continuous quantum error correction was proposed in Ref.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A possible route to perform QEC without the overhead of ancilla qubits is to directly monitor the error syndromes continuously in time [22,23]. With this variation, the code subspaces for the error syndromes are directly coupled to a continuous readout device [24][25][26][27][28][29][30], avoiding the need for periodic entangling gates and additional ancilla measurements. This idea of continuous quantum error correction was proposed in Ref.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since we expect most of the off-diagonal terms to damp quickly, we only consider five relevant density matrix elements: 44 , and x 5 ≡ jρ 23 j [52]. In order to compare the Bayesian prediction to the true density matrix, we perform conditional tomography [12,53] to experimentally reconstruct the full experimental mapping V t ↦ ρðV t ; tÞ.…”
Section: Trajectories Of Transmon Qubitsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In solid-state systems, such as superconducting qubit transitions in the microwave regime, there has been tremendous interest in continuously generating bipartite [3][4][5][6]39] and multipartite [2,40,41] entangled states, using weak measurements that slowly interact with the qubits, in such a way that enables the resolution of the dynamical aspects of the entangling backaction. Analog feedback control can naturally be applied in the weak continuousmeasurement regimes [42][43][44], and digital feedbackgenerated entanglement has already been demonstrated [45]. Joint measurement is uniquely useful as a means to generate entanglement between remote qubits [12,[46][47][48][49][50], for which no local coupling exists and therefore no unitary means of generating entanglement are available.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this context, different schemes have been proposed [23][24][25][26][27][28]55] and implemented [29][30][31] which rely on the use of a parity meter on the collective state of two qubits. The introduction of a feedback control based on the readout of a continuous weak measurement of parity provides further means to entangle bipartite systems [32][33][34][35]. A parity meter of the state of two qubits, α and β, discriminates if they are in an even or odd parity collective state, associated to the two eigenvalues 1 and −1 of the parity operator An advantage of the class of schemes based on parity measurements is that they do not require direct interaction between the qubits, a feature that makes them suitable for linear optics setups, e.g., the scheme for quantum computing discussed in Ref [36].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%