1983
DOI: 10.1177/002221948301600106
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On Defining Learning Disabilities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

1984
1984
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…IQ tests included the Wechsler Intelligence Scales for Children -Revised (WISC-R) (Wechsler 1974, Norwegian version 1978, McCarthy Scales for Children's Abilities (McCarthy 1972), Leiter International Performance Scale (Leiter 1979), Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale (Thorndike et al 1986), and Raven's Progressive Matrices (Raven et al 1983). Developmental tests included the Vineland Adaptive Behaviour Scales (Sparrow et al 1984), Griffiths Mental Developmental Scale (Griffiths 1970), and Illinois Test of Psycholinguistic Abilities (Kirk and Kirk 1968). In children who had very reduced cognitive functioning and/or whose behaviour was substantially disturbed, so that the administration of a formal test was not possible, IQ was assessed indirectly according to the criteria of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV) (American Psychiatric Association 1994).…”
Section: Case Finding and Psychometric Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…IQ tests included the Wechsler Intelligence Scales for Children -Revised (WISC-R) (Wechsler 1974, Norwegian version 1978, McCarthy Scales for Children's Abilities (McCarthy 1972), Leiter International Performance Scale (Leiter 1979), Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale (Thorndike et al 1986), and Raven's Progressive Matrices (Raven et al 1983). Developmental tests included the Vineland Adaptive Behaviour Scales (Sparrow et al 1984), Griffiths Mental Developmental Scale (Griffiths 1970), and Illinois Test of Psycholinguistic Abilities (Kirk and Kirk 1968). In children who had very reduced cognitive functioning and/or whose behaviour was substantially disturbed, so that the administration of a formal test was not possible, IQ was assessed indirectly according to the criteria of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV) (American Psychiatric Association 1994).…”
Section: Case Finding and Psychometric Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The condition has been known for many years under a variety of labels including brain injury, minimal brain dysfunction (MBD), aphasia, dyslexia, and a host of others (Kirk & Chalfant, 1984). The term learning disabilities became popular in 1963 when, at a joint meeting of the Fund for Perceptually Handicapped…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to DeHirsch, Jansky, and Langford (1965), teaching methods should, to a large extent, be determined by the student's modality strengths and weaknesses. Kirk and Kirk (1971), Sabatino and Hayden (1970), Frostig (1965), Wepman and Bond (1960), Morency (1960), and Chall (1967) agree. In fact, according to Farr (1971), students should not only learn in their preferred modality, but should be tested in it.…”
Section: Selected Modality Researchmentioning
confidence: 88%