2017
DOI: 10.3934/amc.2017014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On defining generalized rank weights

Abstract: This paper investigates the generalized rank weights, with a definition implied by the study of the generalized rank weight enumerator. We study rank metric codes over $L$, where $L$ is a finite Galois extension of a field $K$. This is a generalization of the case where $K = \mathbb{F}_q$ and $L = \mathbb{F}_{q^m}$ of Gabidulin codes to arbitrary characteristic. We show equivalence to previous definitions, in particular the ones by Kurihara-Matsumoto-Uyematsu, Oggier-Sboui and Ducoat. As an application of the … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
76
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
(26 reference statements)
2
76
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We adopt the definition from [17] and, in Section 2, we show that it is invariant with respect to equivalence of rank-metric codes. We also show that the definition of generalized weights for rank-metric codes from [10], which generalizes definitions from [11,24,8], is not invariant with respect to code equivalence.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We adopt the definition from [17] and, in Section 2, we show that it is invariant with respect to equivalence of rank-metric codes. We also show that the definition of generalized weights for rank-metric codes from [10], which generalizes definitions from [11,24,8], is not invariant with respect to code equivalence.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Notice that one could also define generalized weights for rank-metric codes following a support-based analogy with codes endowed with the Hamming metric. This naturally leads to generalizing the invariants proposed in [11], [24] and [8] as in the following Definition 2.6. This approach has been followed, e.g., in [10].…”
Section: Optimal Anticodes and Generalized Weightsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There are several approaches for the notion of generalized weights for rank metric codes [JP17, KMU15, OS12, DK15, Rav16]. These existing definitions were shown to be equivalent in [JP17].…”
Section: Now In the Above Equation Ifmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These characterizations naturally recover well-known characterizations of Hammingmetric and rank-metric support spaces. Item 2 in the case n = 1 is the well-known fact that Hamming-support spaces are cartesian products of factors {0} or F. Item 3 in the case ℓ = 1 corresponds to the characterization in [24,Th. 4.3 & Prop.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%