2000
DOI: 10.1353/cch.2000.0002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On Cultural Hybridity: Interpreting Colonial Authority and Performance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is generally discussed within the context of Bhabha's (1994) model of cultural hybridity, in which post colonial societies are not characterized by the wholesale replacement of Indigenous beliefs and practices by Western ones, but develop a unique hybrid of the two. Moreover, this hybridity should not be understood as a merging of two static opposing cultural forms, but rather as the ongoing negotiation of identity in the continuing colonial encounter; and the extent of this cultural inbetween-ness is open to strategic manipulation by social actors (Benton and Muth 2000). Gosden (2004: 92), following White's (1991) delineation of post-Contact hybridity between Algonquian people and European trappers, refers to this shifting and in-between cultural space as a "Middle Ground," constantly open to negotiation and affecting and developed not just by the colonized but also by their colonizers.…”
Section: Adopting and Resisting European Technologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is generally discussed within the context of Bhabha's (1994) model of cultural hybridity, in which post colonial societies are not characterized by the wholesale replacement of Indigenous beliefs and practices by Western ones, but develop a unique hybrid of the two. Moreover, this hybridity should not be understood as a merging of two static opposing cultural forms, but rather as the ongoing negotiation of identity in the continuing colonial encounter; and the extent of this cultural inbetween-ness is open to strategic manipulation by social actors (Benton and Muth 2000). Gosden (2004: 92), following White's (1991) delineation of post-Contact hybridity between Algonquian people and European trappers, refers to this shifting and in-between cultural space as a "Middle Ground," constantly open to negotiation and affecting and developed not just by the colonized but also by their colonizers.…”
Section: Adopting and Resisting European Technologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some criticism has been levelled at Bhabha's (1994) conceptualisation of the term hybrid identities. Firstly, Bhabha (1994) assumes that there is a distinct cultural divide between the coloniser and the colonised (Benton and Muth 2000), an assumption that negates the fact that people from a particular class and ethnic background can be driven by different motives and can react differently in a given situation (Fitzgerald 2007). Secondly, feminists criticise Bhabha's (1994) notion of hybridity as it does not account for gender and the role of women in power relationships.…”
Section: Hybrid Identity Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the Hawaiian Islands, it seems, commoner resistance was largely ineffective as Hawaiian royalty and chiefly elites sought to ally themselves with agents of the emergent colonial powers (see Mullins and Paynter 2000 for a relevant discussion). Hawaiian elites' social construction of hybrid identities exemplifies a process that has been considered by scholars of colonialism elsewhere in the world (e.g., Benton and Muth 2000;Bhabha 1994;Young 1995). In many regions of the colonial world strategies of resistance by the colonized were occasionally rewarded with some measure of success (e.g., contributors in Preucel 2002).…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%