1998
DOI: 10.1007/bf01531332
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On cox processes and credit risky securities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
572
0
17

Year Published

2004
2004
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 931 publications
(608 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
4
572
0
17
Order By: Relevance
“…SP d (t)) is the survival probability of the counterparty (resp. the dealer) up to time t, e.g., conditional on a realization of the default intensity (or hazard rate) process in a Cox framework, see Lando (1998). Here we assume that the default times τ c and τ d are independent of the portfolio values V τ c and V τ d , respectively.…”
Section: Xvamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SP d (t)) is the survival probability of the counterparty (resp. the dealer) up to time t, e.g., conditional on a realization of the default intensity (or hazard rate) process in a Cox framework, see Lando (1998). Here we assume that the default times τ c and τ d are independent of the portfolio values V τ c and V τ d , respectively.…”
Section: Xvamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a time-dependent process for the trigger variable of epidemics, we here employ the so-called doubly stochastic Poisson process, or a Cox process (see [4]), which we recall briefly here.…”
Section: B Doubly Stochastic Poisson Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A default event associated with a single firm occurs as in intensity-based models introduced by, among others, Artzner and Delbaen [1] , Madan and Unal [26], Lando [24] and Jarrow and Turnbull [21]. However our valuation mechanism incorporates information from the firm's stock price.…”
Section: General Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%