Proceedings of the IEEE Symposium on Emerging Technologies, 2005.
DOI: 10.1109/icet.2005.1558852
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On Cooley-Tukey FFT method for zero padded signals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The second one is the frequency resolution, which is the definition of the distance between frequency bins. Whereas the spectral resolution can only be increased by increasing the time window of the signal, the frequency resolution is determined by the number of input data points in the sequence given to the DFT [27][28][29][30]. A longer data sequence is usually obtained by using the zero-padding method, which is described below.…”
Section: Zero-padded Fftmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second one is the frequency resolution, which is the definition of the distance between frequency bins. Whereas the spectral resolution can only be increased by increasing the time window of the signal, the frequency resolution is determined by the number of input data points in the sequence given to the DFT [27][28][29][30]. A longer data sequence is usually obtained by using the zero-padding method, which is described below.…”
Section: Zero-padded Fftmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Coming back to FFT with zero padding at the end of the signal, it increases the resolution but also requires an additional length of the signal to transform. Moreover, in the case of two‐dimensional signals, it necessitates storage and manipulation of large matrices (the original image is bordered with zeros), which may lead to on‐board memory concerns.…”
Section: Zoom Fft Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, we can further simplify the proposed algorithm since the large number of samples in S(v n , m) is set to be zero. Then, it can be applied to some of the FFT algorithms that are using information about zero samples [31,32]. For a radar image of dimension M Â N within Q non-zero samples, calculation complexity of these algorithms is O(MN log 2 Q).…”
Section: Algorithm For Imaging Of Moving Targetsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in the next step, well-concentrated objects are removed from the PFT and we can calculate the PFT for the remaining radar image by removing from the PFT of the radar image obtained in the previous step, the PFT of the radar image of highly concentrated objects. These highly concentrated objects occupy a very small part of the image and again we can use the simplified procedure for the evaluation of the PFT from [31,32]. In order to illustrate the calculation complexity, consider the following setup: size of radar image M Â N ¼ 256 Â 256, number of iterations in the search for optimal chirp rate r ¼ 10, p ¼ 25% of chirps with significant energy, 5 objects of 16 pixels each with different chirp rates (motion parameters).…”
Section: Algorithm For Imaging Of Moving Targetsmentioning
confidence: 99%