2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.cap.2013.10.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On confinement characteristics of the newly developed sawtooth-free plasmas in KSTAR tokamak

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

4
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As shown, the 1st NB was injected during the current ramp-up phase and the 2nd and the 3rd NB were injected at the same time right after the current overshoot. The waveform of the plasma current such as the maximum plasma current value, plasma current ramp-down rate and main heating timing was designed to optimise the s/q profile based on a variety of ASTRA predictive simulations [32]. As shown in figure 5, the plasma performance began to increase during the plasma current overshoot at around 1.8 s. The performance was further increased after the main heating was applied, but degraded due to the n = 1 and or n = 2 mode.…”
Section: Plasma Current Overshoot Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As shown, the 1st NB was injected during the current ramp-up phase and the 2nd and the 3rd NB were injected at the same time right after the current overshoot. The waveform of the plasma current such as the maximum plasma current value, plasma current ramp-down rate and main heating timing was designed to optimise the s/q profile based on a variety of ASTRA predictive simulations [32]. As shown in figure 5, the plasma performance began to increase during the plasma current overshoot at around 1.8 s. The performance was further increased after the main heating was applied, but degraded due to the n = 1 and or n = 2 mode.…”
Section: Plasma Current Overshoot Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To generate the Alfvénic activity easily with the sub-Alfvénic beamions, high q min (or high q 0 ) scenario was selected because the elevated central safety factor (q) profile with weak magnetic shear has less continuum damping. This scenario with q 0 over 1.5 (higher than 2.0 in the initial stage of discharge) has been achieved by the early shaping (diverting) recipe [31,72] and the off-axis ECCD so as to delay the plasma current diffusion.…”
Section: Experiments For the Tae Control Feasibility Using The Eccdmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Maximum beam power and energy are about 5.0 MW and 100 keV, respectively. Since the nominal beam energy (60-100 keV) is sub-Alfvénic under the condition of the usual toroidal field strength (1.5-3.0 T) on KSTAR, destabilization of AEs occurs via the sideband resonances (v b ∼ v A /3) with the shear Alfvén waves [31,34]. v b and v A are the parallel speed of the beam ion and the Alfvén speed, respectively.…”
Section: Heating Current Drive and Diagnosticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Korea Superconducting Tokamak Advanced Research (KSTAR) [13,14] is addressing the establishment of highperformance, steady-state operations with various advanced operation scenarios [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22]. Among them, hybrid scenarios have been explored for years [23,24]. Hybrid scenarios have been attempted by utilizing three co-direction on-axis Neutral Beam Injection (NBI) sources providing up to 5 MW as the primary heating source [25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%