2015
DOI: 10.1007/s00373-015-1643-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On Computing the Number of Latin Rectangles

Abstract: Doyle (circa 1980) found a formula for the number of k ×n Latin rectangles L k,n . This formula remained dormant until it was recently used for counting k × n Latin rectangles, where k ∈ {4, 5, 6}. We give a formal proof of Doyle's formula for arbitrary k. We also improve a previous implementation of this formula, which we use to find L k,n when k = 4 and n ≤ 150, when k = 5 and n ≤ 40 and when k = 6 and n ≤ 15. Motivated by computational data for 3 ≤ k ≤ 6, some research problems and conjectures about the di… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
(54 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The authors have made efforts to ensure the numbers and formulas presented here are as bug-free as possible; we document these efforts in this section. First, notice that some results can immediately be checked by taking into account the already known results mentioned in the introductory section, particularly those ones concerning Latin rectangles [41,50,53,61,62,70] and partial Latin rectangles of small orders [1,20,27,28,30,34,73]. Further, the various source codes used and their output are available from [35].…”
Section: Verificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The authors have made efforts to ensure the numbers and formulas presented here are as bug-free as possible; we document these efforts in this section. First, notice that some results can immediately be checked by taking into account the already known results mentioned in the introductory section, particularly those ones concerning Latin rectangles [41,50,53,61,62,70] and partial Latin rectangles of small orders [1,20,27,28,30,34,73]. Further, the various source codes used and their output are available from [35].…”
Section: Verificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is unrealistic to expect a succinct solution to both problems for arbitrary r, s, n, and m, since they include in particular the number of Latin squares of given order n, which is a long-standing research problem in combinatorics. This is known only for order n 11 [41,53]; see [61,62,70] for some related results on Latin rectangles. Currently, the number of partial Latin rectangles is known only for r, s, n 6 [27,28,30].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Counting, enumerating, and classifying Latin rectangles are classical problems in combinatorial design theory. Currently, it is known() the number of Latin squares of order up to 11 and their distribution into isotopism, isomorphism, and main classes, together with the number of r × s Latin rectangles based on [ n ], for r ≤ s = n ≤11 and some results for r ≤6 and s = n >11(see the literature() and the references therein). Nevertheless, the equivalent problems for partial Latin rectangles have not been dealt with in depth yet.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is unrealistic to expect a succinct solution to both problems for arbitrary r, s, n, and m, since they include in particular the number of Latin squares of given order n, which is a long-standing research problem in combinatorics. This is known only for order n ≤ 11 [38,50]; see [58,59,66] for some related results on Latin rectangles. Currently, the number of partial Latin rectangles is known only for r, s, n ≤ 6 [25,26,27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%