2020
DOI: 10.1109/access.2020.3036600
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On Computationally-Efficient Reference Design Acquisition for Reduced-Cost Constrained Modeling and Re-Design of Compact Microwave Passives

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
(104 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Table 1 gathers a few exemplary design tasks for microwave components. Note that in the presented formulations, some of the design objectives are treated as constraints, and handled using a penalty function approach 82 . For more information about penalty functions see, e.g., 82 , 83 .…”
Section: Circuit Re-design Using Concurrent Scaling and Intermittent ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Table 1 gathers a few exemplary design tasks for microwave components. Note that in the presented formulations, some of the design objectives are treated as constraints, and handled using a penalty function approach 82 . For more information about penalty functions see, e.g., 82 , 83 .…”
Section: Circuit Re-design Using Concurrent Scaling and Intermittent ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“… $ The coefficient β > 0 is a penalty factor that controls the contribution of the penalty terms to the merit function 82 . …”
Section: Circuit Re-design Using Concurrent Scaling and Intermittent ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, EM simulation results may contain a certain level of numerical noise, being a result of adaptive meshing techniques, or specific termination criteria used by the EM solvers. As mentioned before, a common mitigation method is a penalty function approach 47 , where the cost function is defined through aggregation of the main objective (size reduction) and contributions from constraint violations, appropriately scaled using weighting factors (penalty coefficients). Although conceptually attractive, optimum setup of the coefficient values is generally an intricate task, often associated with preparatory optimization runs.…”
Section: Miniaturization Of Microwave Passives With Direct Constraint...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, straightforward constraint handling is inconvenient. A widely used alternative is to incorporate penalty functions 47 , in which the main objective (size reduction) is supplemented with a linear combination of appropriately quantified constraint violations 48 . The advantage of this approach is problem reformulation, so that it becomes a formally unconstrained endeavor.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As mentioned earlier, the number of trial points can be reduced by exploiting the sensitivity information 72 , whereas their identification costs may be diminished by warm-start optimization algorithms (e.g. 76 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%