“…., N. Furthermore, lim n⟶∞ ‖x n − u n ‖ � 0. Consequently, lim n⟶∞ ‖x n+1 − x n ‖ 2 � lim n⟶∞ ‖1/2(x n − u n )‖ 2 � 0 which implies that x n is a Cauchy sequence in K. Also, since K is convex and closed, x n converges strongly to some q ∈ K. From the Opial condition of H and the demiclosedness property of T i , we have that q ∈ T i q, for all i − 1, 2,... , N. e remaining part of the proof is similar to the method of [34], eorem 20. erefore, it is omitted.…”