1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0166-8641(96)00126-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On complete resolutions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
40
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This module has played an important role in complete cohomology. For more details, see [7]. We also recall that the flat dimension of a left G-module M is defined by…”
Section: Answers To Questions a And B And Other Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This module has played an important role in complete cohomology. For more details, see [7]. We also recall that the flat dimension of a left G-module M is defined by…”
Section: Answers To Questions a And B And Other Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that any two weakly complete resolution for G are chain homotopy equivalent (cf. [7,Lemma 2.4]). Thus the weakly complete cohomology of G is well defined [11,Definition 2.9].…”
Section: Remark 32mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It follows from Mis-lin's approach to complete cohomology that the functors Ext * R (M, ) may be computed, in the case where M has a complete resolution P * , as the cohomology groups of the complex Hom R (P * , ), (cf. [7], Theorem 1.2). In particular, if M is Gorenstein projective, then the complete cohomology group Ext 0 R (M, N ) may be naturally identified for any left R-module N with the quotient Hom R (M, N ) of the abelian group Hom R (M, N ) by the subgroup consisting of all R-linear maps f : M −→ N that factor through a projective left R-module.…”
Section: Complete Cohomology and Gorenstein Projective Dimensionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The first and third authors of the present work introduced a theory in a series of papers [6,8,7,16] the last one of which builds on the ideas of Benson. In view of the original Bieri-Eckmann theory, it seems very natural to consider what happens if one requires some or many cohomology functors to commute with filtered colimits. The behaviour of groups for which this kind of continuity of functors begins after some steps was investigated by the third author and then further in a series of papers by Hamilton [17,11,13,12].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%