30th Annual Conference of IEEE Industrial Electronics Society, 2004. IECON 2004
DOI: 10.1109/iecon.2004.1432201
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On comparison of attractors for chaotic mobile robots

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some chaotic path planning literature [188,189] present comparisons of well-known chaotic equations. These comparisons are performed to establish which equations are better applicable to various testing conditions judging by their coverage rate.…”
Section: F Systems Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some chaotic path planning literature [188,189] present comparisons of well-known chaotic equations. These comparisons are performed to establish which equations are better applicable to various testing conditions judging by their coverage rate.…”
Section: F Systems Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Jansri et al experimentally proved that the method of combining chaotic attractors is effective for motion planning of mobile robots [55][56][57][58]. They experimented with robot trajectories by employing various types of chaotic patterns; for example, Chua's, Lorenz's and Rossler's attractors.…”
Section: Chaotic Mobile Robotmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Signals, which are produced by chaotic systems or circuits, are used to guide autonomous robots for exploration of a terrain for vigilance. In the literature, very known chaotic systems, such as Arnold dynamical system, Standard or Taylor-Chirikov map, Lorenz system, Van der Pol map, and Chua circuit, have been used [7][8][9][10][11]. In [12], we also present a chaotic motion path planner, which is improved by arcsine and arccosine transformations, based on a Logistic Map for an autonomous mobile robot to cover an unknown terrain randomly, unpredictably, and evenly.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%