Proceedings of the Eighth International Symposium on Signal Processing and Its Applications, 2005.
DOI: 10.1109/isspa.2005.1581010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On comparing speech quality of various narrow- and wideband speech codecs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…e memory requirements of the partial Speex port to BelaSigna 300 are presented in Table 3. [28]. In order to evaluate the outcome of the voice codec implementation, a series of tests on the speech quality was performed using ITU-T Perceptual Evaluation of Speech Quality test methodology for automated assessment of the speech quality as experienced by a user of a telephony system [29].…”
Section: Codec Implementationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…e memory requirements of the partial Speex port to BelaSigna 300 are presented in Table 3. [28]. In order to evaluate the outcome of the voice codec implementation, a series of tests on the speech quality was performed using ITU-T Perceptual Evaluation of Speech Quality test methodology for automated assessment of the speech quality as experienced by a user of a telephony system [29].…”
Section: Codec Implementationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [9] a comparison between narrow and wideband coded speech is presented. The narrowband represents a bandwidth of 300-3400Hz while wideband represents a bandwidth of 50-7000Hz.…”
Section: Limitationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [9] wideband codec is preferred but narrow band codecs gives a much good results which is not discussed here. There is much more maturing is required in these codecs to achieve much better quality.…”
Section: Limitationmentioning
confidence: 99%