“…(3) (a, b) ∈ {(2, 17), (18, 1)} (mod 32). (4) (a, b) ∈ {(10, 9), (10,5) (14,13), (2,13), (6, 5)} (mod 16) and ν 2 (b + as + s 6 ) = 2ν 2 (a + 6s 5 ) for some integer s for which F(x) is x − s-regular with respect to p = 2.…”
Section: Theorem 22 the Prime Integer 2 Is A Common Index Divisor Of ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For (a, b) ∈ {(14, 13), (6,5), (2,13), (10,5), (10, 9)} (mod 16), we have N + φ 2 (F) has a single side of height 1. By Remark 3, φ 2 provides a unique prime ideal p 21 of Z K lying above 2 with residue degree 2.…”
Section: Special Cases and Examplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also in [13], Gaál studied the multi-monogenity of number fields defined by some sextic irreducible trinomials. In [10], for p = 2, 3, we characterized when p is a common index divisor of any number field generated by a complex root of an irreducible trinomial x 5 + ax 2 + b. In [25], for any number K defined by a trinomial F(x) = x 6 + ax + b ∈ Z[x], Jakhar and Kumar gave some necessary conditions on a and b, which guarantee the non-monogenity of K. Based on the form of the factorization of pZ K , Engstrom calculated ν p (i(K)) for any number field K of degree less than 8 and any prime integer less than 7 [12].…”
For a number field K defined by a trinomailJakhar and Kumar gave some necessary conditions on a and b, which guarantee the non-monogenity of K [25]. In this paper, for every prime integer p, we characterize when p is a common index divisor of K. In particular, if any one of these conditions holds, then K is not monogenic. In such a way our proposed results extend those of Jakhar and Kumar.
“…(3) (a, b) ∈ {(2, 17), (18, 1)} (mod 32). (4) (a, b) ∈ {(10, 9), (10,5) (14,13), (2,13), (6, 5)} (mod 16) and ν 2 (b + as + s 6 ) = 2ν 2 (a + 6s 5 ) for some integer s for which F(x) is x − s-regular with respect to p = 2.…”
Section: Theorem 22 the Prime Integer 2 Is A Common Index Divisor Of ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For (a, b) ∈ {(14, 13), (6,5), (2,13), (10,5), (10, 9)} (mod 16), we have N + φ 2 (F) has a single side of height 1. By Remark 3, φ 2 provides a unique prime ideal p 21 of Z K lying above 2 with residue degree 2.…”
Section: Special Cases and Examplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also in [13], Gaál studied the multi-monogenity of number fields defined by some sextic irreducible trinomials. In [10], for p = 2, 3, we characterized when p is a common index divisor of any number field generated by a complex root of an irreducible trinomial x 5 + ax 2 + b. In [25], for any number K defined by a trinomial F(x) = x 6 + ax + b ∈ Z[x], Jakhar and Kumar gave some necessary conditions on a and b, which guarantee the non-monogenity of K. Based on the form of the factorization of pZ K , Engstrom calculated ν p (i(K)) for any number field K of degree less than 8 and any prime integer less than 7 [12].…”
For a number field K defined by a trinomailJakhar and Kumar gave some necessary conditions on a and b, which guarantee the non-monogenity of K [25]. In this paper, for every prime integer p, we characterize when p is a common index divisor of K. In particular, if any one of these conditions holds, then K is not monogenic. In such a way our proposed results extend those of Jakhar and Kumar.
“…be the index of the field K. In [9], Davis and Spearman calculated the index of the quartic field defined by x 4 + ax + b. El Fadil gave in [11] necessary and sufficient conditions on a and b so that a rational prime integer p is a common index divisor of number fields defined by x 5 + ax 2 + b. Jakhar and Kumar in [26] gave infinite families of non-monogenic number fields defined by x 6 + ax + b. In [15], Gaál studied the multi-monogenity of sextic number fields defined by trinomials of type x 6 + ax 3 + b.…”
Let K = Q(θ) be a number field generated by a complex root θ of a monic irreducible trinomialIn this paper, we deal with the problem of the non-monogenity of K. More precisely, we provide some explicit conditions on a, b, n, and m for which K is not monogenic. As application, we show that there are infinite families of non-monogenic number fields defined by trinomials of degree n = 2 r • 3 k with r and k are positive integers. We also give two infinite families of non-monogenic number fields defined by trinomials of degree 6. Finally, we illustrate our results by giving some examples.
“…In [7], Davis and Spearman calculated the index of the quartic field defined by x 4 + ax + b. In [17], Gaál studied the monogenity of sextic number fields defined by trinomials of type x 6 + ax 3 + b. El Fadil gave in [10] necessary and sufficient conditions on a and b so that a rational prime integer p is a common index divisor of number fields defined by x 5 + ax 2 + b. In [2], Ben Yakkou studied the monogenity of certain number fields defined by x 8 + ax + b.…”
Let K = Q(θ) be a number field generated by a complex root θ of a monic irreducible trinomial of type F (x) = x 2 r + ax m + b ∈ Z[x] and Z K its ring of integers. In this paper, we study the monogenity of K. More precisely, when m = 1, we provide some explicit conditions on a, b, and r for which K is not monogenic. We also construct a family of irreducible trinomials which are not monogenic, but their roots generate monogenic number fields. To illustrate our results, we give some computational examples.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.