2013
DOI: 10.2178/jsl.7802120
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On Colimits and Elementary Embeddings

Abstract: We give a sharper version of a theorem of Rosický, Trnková and Adámek [13], and a new proof of a theorem of Rosický [12], both about colimits in categories of structures. Unlike the original proofs, which use category-theoretic methods, we use set-theoretic arguments involving elementary embeddings given by large cardinals such as α-strongly compact and C(n)-extendible cardinals.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
39
0
3

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
2
39
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Vopěnka's principle implies that every full embedding between accessible categories is accessible. The same conclusion can be inferred from the existence of sufficiently large C(n)-extendible cardinals [8].…”
Section: Accessible Categoriessupporting
confidence: 62%
“…Vopěnka's principle implies that every full embedding between accessible categories is accessible. The same conclusion can be inferred from the existence of sufficiently large C(n)-extendible cardinals [8].…”
Section: Accessible Categoriessupporting
confidence: 62%
“…For the purpose of this discussion, say a cardinal κ is λ-L µ,ω -compact if any κ-complete filter generated by at most λ many sets extends to a µ-complete ultrafilter. In recent work [3,5,6], L µ,ω -compactness has been referred to as "µstrong compactness", mostly with µ = ℵ 1 . This fits with a tradition in which λ-L κ,ω -compactness of κ was called λ-compactness (indeed, this is the terminology of the standard text [13]), with "strongly" potentially thought of as indicating "for all λ".…”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Let α = |I|, and let j : V → M be an elementary embedding as in Theorem 2.5 for our κ, α and µ = µ L . Note that because M is closed under < µ L -tuples, M correctly computes whether an object is in Red Σ 1 ,Σ (T ): being a model for the theory T is ∆ 1 -definable from the "set of all < µ-tuples" function P µ , and hence is absolute between models of set theory that agree on P µ (see [3,Proposition 16], [4,Proposition 3.3]). Consider the diagram j(D) in M. It is a j(κ)-directed diagram with index category j(I) of cardinality j(α).…”
Section: Powerful Imagesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Also, several other implications of the principle were proved long ago, especially in category theory (see [1]). Recently there has been a revived interest in VP through new set-theoretic proofs of category-theoretic results (see Bagaria and Brooke-Taylor [2]). Furthermore, Brooke-Taylor [5] showed the relative consistency of VP with almost all usual ZFC-independent statements, like GCH and diamond principles (see the Introduction of [5]).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%