2015
DOI: 10.1080/03081079.2015.1106730
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On co-design of filter and fault estimator against randomly occurring nonlinearities and randomly occurring deception attacks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, it is worth noting that, due to the influence of internal and external environmental factors, nonlinearity always exists in the actual system. At present, the control problem of the network system with nonlinearity is widely concerned [36]. Since the nonlinear perturbation phenomena may vary arbitrarily, Bernoulli distribution is more appropriate to describe the randomly occurring nonlinearity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, it is worth noting that, due to the influence of internal and external environmental factors, nonlinearity always exists in the actual system. At present, the control problem of the network system with nonlinearity is widely concerned [36]. Since the nonlinear perturbation phenomena may vary arbitrarily, Bernoulli distribution is more appropriate to describe the randomly occurring nonlinearity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the co-design problem of state and fault estimator using stochastic system model, a robust fault estimation filter design was proposed in terms of Riccati-like difference equations in [44,45]. Using the assumption that the sampling interval was sufficiently small, it was supposed that the fault difference item was too small to be neglected.…”
Section: Problem Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in practice, faults always generate a great amplitude change of a certain time, especially when time-varying faults occur. Compared with the assumption in [44,45], it is clear that time-varying fault model described in Equation (6) covers the results of constant faults as a special case, which is less restrictive.…”
Section: Problem Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is well recognized that the existence of the randomly occurring incomplete information would highly degrade the system performance if not handled properly. So far, a series of estimation and filtering schemes has been developed for networked systems with randomly occurring incomplete information in the literature, and great efforts have been made to deal with the randomly occurring nonlinearities in [49], [95]- [99], the randomly occurring uncertainties in [94], [97], the randomly occurring sensor saturations in [40], [72], the randomly occurring sensor delays in [31], [32], [38], [100], [101], the randomly occurring signal quantization in [41], [102], and the randomly occurring faults in [103]. Accordingly, several techniques for analysis and synthesis of the networked systems have been given, including innovation analysis approach [31], [32], linear matrix inequality approach [97], Hamilton-Jacobi-Isaacs inequality method [100], difference linear matrix inequality method [41], Riccati difference equation approach [101], [102], and game theory method [54].…”
Section: E Randomly Occurring Incomplete Informationmentioning
confidence: 99%