Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
Proceedings of the 2004 Intelligent Sensors, Sensor Networks and Information Processing Conference, 2004.
DOI: 10.1109/issnip.2004.1417457
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On Classifying Silhouettes in Adverse Conditions

Abstract: We compare the performance of holistic and local feature approaches for the purpose of classifying silhouettes in adverse conditions (i.e. occlusions by other silhouettes, noise and imperfect localization by a Region of Interest algorithm, resulting in clipping and scale changes). Holistic feature extractors based on Hu's moment invariants and Principal Component Analysis (PCA) are coupled with a classifier based on gaussian densities, while a local feature extractor based on the 2D Hadamard Transform (HT) is … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
(50 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In [24], Fourier descriptors on different shape signature functions are evaluated and compared. In [23], Hu moments, PCA feature and 2D Hadamard Transform are compared in classifying silhouettes in adverse conditions (e.g. clipping, occlusion and noise), where the shapes are mostly ships.…”
Section: Comparison Of Shape Featuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In [24], Fourier descriptors on different shape signature functions are evaluated and compared. In [23], Hu moments, PCA feature and 2D Hadamard Transform are compared in classifying silhouettes in adverse conditions (e.g. clipping, occlusion and noise), where the shapes are mostly ships.…”
Section: Comparison Of Shape Featuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2D shape analysis is itself a discipline in pattern recognition, and a lot of shape features could be tried [19,20]. There exists some work that compares different shape features [23][24][25][26][27][28], but most are either for generic shape recognition, or in the context of particular applications other than pose discrimination. It is important to notice that shape analysis for pose discrimination is inherently different from other applications.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%