1984
DOI: 10.1515/flih.1984.5.2.331
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On Clarifying Some Points of Slavonic Accentology: The Quantity of the Thematic Vowel in the Present Tense and Related Issues

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…22) have adequately been refuted in the literature (cf. Vermeer 1984, Kortlandt 2011: 37-39 and 2012b.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…22) have adequately been refuted in the literature (cf. Vermeer 1984, Kortlandt 2011: 37-39 and 2012b.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another is what I have argued is a retention ťeature, the roundedness oť ProtoSlavic *a, characteristic oť northem and eastem Slovene dialects and Kajkavian, which prevented mergers with strong jers characteristic oťthe western halť oťSouth Slavic (see Greenberg 1998 and 2000: 65ťftor details). StilI another is the retention oť length in mobile ("c"-stressed) present tense ťorms oť e-stem verbs, ťound in Carinthian and Prekmurje Slovene (north-west and north-east, respectively) and central Slovak (see Venneer 1984;Greenberg 2000: 93). In my view, these circumPannonian ťeatures are the aťterglow oť Pannonian Slavic.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%