Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2021
DOI: 10.1038/s41566-021-00792-0
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On-chip sampling of optical fields with attosecond resolution

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
43
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
1
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our measurements indicate that charge interaction starts to affect the electron dynamics above a near-field intensity of 7.5 × 10 13 W/cm 2 or around 1000 e − /shot for 4.5 fs pulses at 750 nm and tungsten needle tips with a tip radius of around 40 nm. While the strong-field tunneling photocurrent experiments on nano-bowties and triangles [25,28,29,31,48] focus mainly on the CEP-dependent current which is on the order of one electron per shot, the total number of charges per shot is typically several orders of magnitude higher [26,27,31] and therefore in a similar regime as for our experiment. Our study also shows that despite the clear charge interaction, waveform-dependent photocurrents can be measured, which is important for the development of applications of field-controlled currents.…”
Section: Figmentioning
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our measurements indicate that charge interaction starts to affect the electron dynamics above a near-field intensity of 7.5 × 10 13 W/cm 2 or around 1000 e − /shot for 4.5 fs pulses at 750 nm and tungsten needle tips with a tip radius of around 40 nm. While the strong-field tunneling photocurrent experiments on nano-bowties and triangles [25,28,29,31,48] focus mainly on the CEP-dependent current which is on the order of one electron per shot, the total number of charges per shot is typically several orders of magnitude higher [26,27,31] and therefore in a similar regime as for our experiment. Our study also shows that despite the clear charge interaction, waveform-dependent photocurrents can be measured, which is important for the development of applications of field-controlled currents.…”
Section: Figmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…electronics driven by optical fields on the PHz-scale. Based on plasmonic nano-bowtie antennas, the CEP-detection using currents [25][26][27], a potential PHz-scale diode [28] and recently on-chip field-resolved sampling of optical waveforms [29] have been demonstrated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The latter point is not only important for enabling measurable signal amplitudes in our sampling setup 27 , 28 but also for future devices, to ensure that a created electronic signal clears the interaction zone before the arrival of a new optical signal, a minimum prerequisite for a rapid succession of switching processes. Field sampling based on tunneling ionization with a perturbation 41 has been demonstrated using field enhancement at a gold nanoantenna 42 . So far, the technique focused on a vacuum channel for electron transport, but the concept may be transferable to tunneling into the conduction band of a solid medium.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the difference t1-t = 309.06946026x10 -12 s. that is, 309.06946026 picoseconds, which is fully measurable with precise technique. 5,7,8…”
Section: Example Of Experimental Verificationmentioning
confidence: 99%