2019
DOI: 10.1364/oe.27.031713
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On-chip implementation of the probabilistic quantum optical state comparison amplifier

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

5
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This clearly indicates that the coupling interaction to the right and to the left single-mode waveguides are effectively opposite in sign, which is a direct proof for a negative coupling constant [15]. This system is also an example for a phase π beam splitter (π-BS), which could be quite useful for interferometric quantum optics [34,39,40], considering concatenated operations [30]. The output profile also coincides with the flat-band mode of a rhombic lattice [41], which is an important subject of research nowadays in photonic lattices.…”
Section: (B)-inset)mentioning
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This clearly indicates that the coupling interaction to the right and to the left single-mode waveguides are effectively opposite in sign, which is a direct proof for a negative coupling constant [15]. This system is also an example for a phase π beam splitter (π-BS), which could be quite useful for interferometric quantum optics [34,39,40], considering concatenated operations [30]. The output profile also coincides with the flat-band mode of a rhombic lattice [41], which is an important subject of research nowadays in photonic lattices.…”
Section: (B)-inset)mentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Without the demonstrated tuning mechanism, orthogonal states simply do not interact on a lattice and hybridized physics is simply not possible on a linear regime. The second outcome of our observation is the generation of a simple and concrete method for exciting higher-order spatial states inside a photonic chip, with perfect spatial controllability that can be a key of success for concatenated photonic operations [30][31][32][33][34][35].…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The current challenge in chip-scale QKD is to integrate the detectors onto the chips alongside the other optical components. Chip scale transmitters are not as bright as bulk optic sources and chip scale receiver systems will often need single mode fibre/waveguide coupling [266]. Chip scale devices also do not solve the requirements of auxiliary systems such as fine pointing and beam expansion.…”
Section: Swap For Space Segmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An integrated platform would be smaller but would require additional hardware to monitor the output. Such sources have been previously developed with small size, weight and power (SWaP) envelopes of the orders of 10 −4 m 3 , 10 −1 kg and < 1 W. They can be made to be monolithic, solid-state devices with further miniaturisation possible through integrated optics fabrication [53,54]; hence, the source can be accommodated in 1U. The main issues will be wavelength matching between different emitters to prevent side-channel leakage, modest temperature stability and reliability in the space environment; the latter is still to be proven [55].…”
Section: Payload Design and System Outlinementioning
confidence: 99%