1979
DOI: 10.1016/s1385-7258(79)80022-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On characters of subgroups

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

1980
1980
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This latter result can also directly be deduced from [11,Theorem 2]. On the other hand, in [10] an example is given of a 2-step solvable compactly generated locally compact group that has the extension property and nevertheless fails to be a SIN-group.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 79%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This latter result can also directly be deduced from [11,Theorem 2]. On the other hand, in [10] an example is given of a 2-step solvable compactly generated locally compact group that has the extension property and nevertheless fails to be a SIN-group.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…However, the two properties are not equivalent in general. For instance, the semidirect product group Z R, where n ∈ Z acts on R by multiplication with 2 n , has the extension property [10], but not the separation property.…”
Section: Theorem 25 Let G Be a Compactly Generated Nilpotent Locallmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Since the extension property as stated in Theorem 1 is inherited by closed subgroups we can use Theorem 1 in [3] to see that in groups satisfying the onesided Wiener property (L) every connected closed subgroup is the direct product of a compact group and a vector group. By analyzing the proof of Theorem 1, however, we can show that the same holds under some weaker conditions and we shall give a proof which is considerably shorter than those given in [3] and [4]. If 77 is abelian and not contained in the center of G, then there is a character y of 77 such that F(y) =/= G; hence G cannot be connected.…”
Section: On Onesided Harmonic Analysis Rolf Wim Henrichsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The arguments used in the proof are essentially the same as those used in [3] to prove Theorem 1. Theorem 2.…”
Section: On Onesided Harmonic Analysis Rolf Wim Henrichsmentioning
confidence: 99%