2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.anihpb.2005.01.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On certain almost Brownian filtrations

Abstract: A consequence of Vershik's results on discrete-time filtrations is the existence, in continuous time, of filtrations F = (F t) t 0 which are "Brownian after zero" (that is, for each ε > 0, F ε = (F ε+t) t 0 is generated by F ε and some F ε-Brownian motion), but not generated by F 0 and any Brownian motion. Among the filtrations that are Brownian after zero, how are the truly Brownian ones characterized? An answer is given by the self-coupling criterion (ii) of Theorem 1. This criterion is always satisfied when… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the succinct language of filtrations (cf. Beghdadi-Sakrani and Emery [2], Émery [12,13]), the natural filtrations of the two processes must both be Coupling, local times, immersions 3 immersed in a common filtration (that is, the martingales of the natural filtrations must remain martingales in the larger common filtration). We therefore propose and adopt the new terminology of immersed couplings to replace the nomenclature of co-adapted or Markovian couplings: Definition 1.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the succinct language of filtrations (cf. Beghdadi-Sakrani and Emery [2], Émery [12,13]), the natural filtrations of the two processes must both be Coupling, local times, immersions 3 immersed in a common filtration (that is, the martingales of the natural filtrations must remain martingales in the larger common filtration). We therefore propose and adopt the new terminology of immersed couplings to replace the nomenclature of co-adapted or Markovian couplings: Definition 1.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the stochastic differential framework (1), synchronous coupling corresponds to K = 0 and J = I, while rotation coupling corresponds to K = 0 and J equal to a d-dimensional rotation. (It is interesting to compare this direction of research with the work of Émery [12], Theorem 1; this characterizes Brownian filtrations using the notion of "self-coupling" -jointly immersed Brownian filtrations for which a prescribed scalar functional is approximately coupled. )…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lemma below is a duplicate of Lemma 2 in [13], which could be proved identically in spite of this difference between the two notions of substantialness.…”
Section: ⊓ ⊔mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The notion of substantial family of σ-fields appears in [13] in a slightly different form. Lemma below is a duplicate of Lemma 2 in [13], which could be proved identically in spite of this difference between the two notions of substantialness.…”
Section: ⊓ ⊔mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Section 2 we introduce the basic notations and results needed in the sequel. For further use in the analysis of co-adapted couplings of spherical Brownian motions, in Lemma 2.1 we derive a characterization of all such couplings, similar to the one obtained in [11] or [15] in the case of Euclidean Brownian motions, and intimately related to Stroock's representation of spherical Brownian motion. Section 3 contains the analysis of Brownian couplings on R n (Theorem 3.1), and in Section 4 we present the analogous result for spherical Brownian motions (Theorem 4.1).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%