1992
DOI: 10.1515/dma.1992.2.5.461
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On cardinality of the set of alternatives in discrete many-criterion problems

Abstract: Under many-criterion formulations of well-known extremal problems (the chain problem, the matching problem, the travelling salesman problem, etc.) we obtain lower bounds for the cardinalities of the Pareto set and the complete set of alternatives. Probability analysis of the structures of these sets is fulfilled, and it is proved that the bounds are exponential for almost all graphs.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
(9 reference statements)
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, with increasing instance size one cannot expect to obtain the complete Pareto local optimum sets by means of a 3-opt in reasonable time, which also explains the strong growth in computation time of the three algorithms from 100 cities to 150 cities (see Figures 5 and 6). This can be also expected, because of the intractability results for these problems [8].…”
Section: Characterization Of the Pareto Local Optimum Setsmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Therefore, with increasing instance size one cannot expect to obtain the complete Pareto local optimum sets by means of a 3-opt in reasonable time, which also explains the strong growth in computation time of the three algorithms from 100 cities to 150 cities (see Figures 5 and 6). This can be also expected, because of the intractability results for these problems [8].…”
Section: Characterization Of the Pareto Local Optimum Setsmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…The MTSP is known to be NP-hard [14]; additionally, it is known that the lower bound on the expected size of the efficient set for the MTSP is an exponential function of the instance size [15].…”
Section: Multiobjective Optimization and The Mtspmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, experimental results obtained for the multiobjective version may also be interpreted in light of the experience on the performance of these techniques for the single objective case. Secondly, despite the fact that the small instances of the single-objective TSP can be solved in a few seconds to optimality by exact algorithms such as concorde (http://www.tsp.gatech.edu/concorde), there are two facts that limit their use under fixed time constraints: the typically large variability in the computation times and the potentially very large number of solutions in the efficient set [15]. Thirdly, significant research efforts have been targeted towards applying SLS algorithms to this problem and it has been studied from several different perspectives: from an approximation [17,18], local search [19][20][21], theoretical [15] and experimental [22] point of view; some related problems have also been studied in the literature [23,24].…”
Section: Multiobjective Optimization and The Mtspmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The BTSP is NP-hard [31] and it has been tackled in a number of research efforts [1,2,5,7,12,15,22].…”
Section: Multiobjective Combinatorial Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%