“…The shift to manifest variables using regression analyses was reasoned to allow for increased interpretability of demographic moderators (Little et al, 2007) and to align with our exploratory approach wherein we did not approach the CC and well‐being relationship with a specific theory (conversely, the use of latent CC and well‐being variables via structural equation modeling would need to be predicated on clear theoretical relationships between variables, see Cohen et al, 1990). Moreover, we used anxiety and hopefulness measures routinely assessed as manifest variables, thus aligning with the broader study of these phenomena (e.g., anxiety: Ganson et al, 2021; Liu et al, 2021; hopefulness: Bryce et al, 2020; D'Amico Guthrie and Fruiht, 2020) Significant interactions were probed using simple slope analysis (Aiken et al, 1991) one standard deviation at, below and above the mean using emtrends (Lenth, 2018). All regressions controlled for disability status, as ableism acts as a force affecting youth (Fine, 2019), and household income, since lower SEP is associated with increased critical action (Roy et al, 2019).…”