2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2020.110145
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On calculated and actual energy savings from thermal building renovations – Long term field evaluation of multifamily buildings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results obtained in this study confirm the general trend observed in thermal restoration of buildings. According to the literature concerning multifamily buildings in Poland, the actual energy savings range between 8.8% and 74.8% of energy savings calculated in audits, depending on the various renovations [35]. In another paper, the economic effects resulting from thermal refurbishment of schools were compared after several operation seasons and were calculated (59-71%), and real savings (33%) differed significantly [37].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The results obtained in this study confirm the general trend observed in thermal restoration of buildings. According to the literature concerning multifamily buildings in Poland, the actual energy savings range between 8.8% and 74.8% of energy savings calculated in audits, depending on the various renovations [35]. In another paper, the economic effects resulting from thermal refurbishment of schools were compared after several operation seasons and were calculated (59-71%), and real savings (33%) differed significantly [37].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A literature review finds a dearth of empirical studies that illustrate the correlation between the performed retrofitting and the predicted and measured gas consumption, in particular in the case of performance gap observed in buildings with poor energy standard and reduced conditions of thermal comfort. Although similar studies were previously published, they usually referred to other locations and involved simulation data on the energy performance before and after refurbishment [16,19], included shorter observation periods and limited number of buildings [35,36] or discussed other types of objects [37].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Work in this domain has demonstrated that, despite technological improvement, increased understanding and better measurement, the gap remains stubbornly common, in both new build (Zero Carbon Hub, 2014a) and retrofit (Cholewa, Balaras, Nizetic, & Siuta-Olcha, 2020). In a longitudinal study over several heating seasons using actual energy consumption data, Cholewa et al (2020) found that the energy consumption of 11 apartment blocks after a retrofit programme varied from 8% to 75% of predicted energy savings. In this case, different processes of retrofit were a partial reason for the wide range but other researchers have attributed the differences to challenges in modelling, occupant behaviour and issues in delivery (Taylor et al, 2018); regulation and policy failures and different priorities amongst large stakeholders (Stevenson, 2019); and processual issues such as unclear responsibility and management issues such as inadequate communication (Zero Carbon Hub, 2014b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The predicted energy effects calculated as part of the audit are comparable with the actual effects obtained during the building operation following thermal retrofitting. The relations between the expected and obtained values obtained under operational conditions are diverse [8,25,[27][28][29][30]. The predicted energy savings are often achieved; however, the results which are superior to those stated in an audit, are seldom obtained [8,27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%