2011
DOI: 10.1007/s11854-011-0025-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On boundary behavior of generalized quasi-isometries

Abstract: It is established a series of criteria for continuous and homeomorphic extension to the boundary of the so-called lower Q-homeomorphisms f between domains in R n = R n ∪ {∞}, n 2, under integral constraints of the type Φ(Q n−1 (x)) dm(x) < ∞ with a convex non-decreasing functionIt is shown that integral conditions on the function Φ found by us are not only sufficient but also necessary for a continuous extension of f to the boundary. It is given also applications of the obtained results to the mappings with fi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
(48 reference statements)
0
12
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…At the same time, this class is a generalization of the known class of mappings with bounded length distortion by Martio-Väisälä from paper [18]. Moreover, this class contains, as a subclass, the so-called finitely bi-Lipschitz mappings introduced for R n , n 2, in paper [10], see also Section 10.6 in book [17], that is, in turn, a natural generalization of the well-known classes of bi-Lipschitz mappings, as well as isometries and quasiisometries.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…At the same time, this class is a generalization of the known class of mappings with bounded length distortion by Martio-Väisälä from paper [18]. Moreover, this class contains, as a subclass, the so-called finitely bi-Lipschitz mappings introduced for R n , n 2, in paper [10], see also Section 10.6 in book [17], that is, in turn, a natural generalization of the well-known classes of bi-Lipschitz mappings, as well as isometries and quasiisometries.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Remark 9.1 Note that by Theorem 5.1 and Remark 5.1 in [16] condition (9.2) is not only sufficient but also necessary for a continuous extendibility to the boundary of all mappings f with the integral restriction (9.1).…”
Section: Recall That a Functionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Remark 8.11. Note that condition (8.10) is not only sufficient but also necessary for a continuous extension to the boundary of all direct mappings f with integral restrictions of type (8.9), see, e.g., Theorem 5.1 and Remark 5.1 in [21]. Recall also that condition (8.10) is equivalent to each of conditions (7.13)-(7.17).…”
Section: Boundary Behavior Of Homeomorphic Solutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%