The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-4049(02)00047-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On bornologies, locales and toposes of M-sets

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An ideal B of P(X) is called bornology into X with extent E(B) = {A ∈ B}. B is also said to be a bornology on E(B), and the pair (E(B), B) is a bornological space [4].…”
Section: The Locale Of All Filters On a Setmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…An ideal B of P(X) is called bornology into X with extent E(B) = {A ∈ B}. B is also said to be a bornology on E(B), and the pair (E(B), B) is a bornological space [4].…”
Section: The Locale Of All Filters On a Setmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The set Born(X) of all bornologies in X is the free compact regular locale generated by P(X), and it is equivalent to the locale of open subsets of the Stone-Čech compactification βX of the discrete topological space X [10, p. 93]. The locale Born(X) was extensively used in [4], where it was proved that it is a subobject classifier of a Grothendieck topos of N N -sets for N N = Set(N, N).…”
Section: The Locale Of All Filters On a Setmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Recently, applications of Lawvere-Tierney topologies in broad topics such as measure theory [7] and quantum Physics [14,15] are observed. In the spacial case, considerable work has been presented that is dedicated to the study of (weak) Lawvere-Tierney topology on a presheaf topos on a small category and especially on a monoid, see [6,5]. It is clear that Lawvere-Tierney sheaves in a topos are exactly injective objects (of course, with respect to dense monomorphisms, not to merely monomorphisms) which are separated too.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%