2018
DOI: 10.1177/1749602018796754
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On binge-watching: Nine critical propositions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Low levels of attention and immersion seemed to have also discouraged participants from using the term 'binge-watching' when describing a viewing session. However, people may have differing personal definitions (Jenner, 2016) according to factors such as age, occupation, family situation (Horeck et al, 2018), the genre of the program and episodes' length, and the viewing and production culture they are part of. Definitions that are susceptible to change with the evolution of their own habits.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Low levels of attention and immersion seemed to have also discouraged participants from using the term 'binge-watching' when describing a viewing session. However, people may have differing personal definitions (Jenner, 2016) according to factors such as age, occupation, family situation (Horeck et al, 2018), the genre of the program and episodes' length, and the viewing and production culture they are part of. Definitions that are susceptible to change with the evolution of their own habits.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As for our first goal, we maintained that viewer autonomy and continuity present two necessary and sufficient attributes for defining BW. Given these, we ruled out appointment viewing in all its different forms (SEAs and MAs) and located BW in self-scheduled television (e.g., box sets, online television; see also Horeck et al 2018; Jenner 2017). In addition, we distinguished BW from CV (i.e., self-scheduled single-episode sessions).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 1. We take that BW “only happens in relation to serialized formats as opposed to films or one-offs” (Horeck et al 2018, 499). …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Binge-watching itself can be seen as part of a long tradition of television technology (VCRs, DVD players, TiVo©, etc.) which has promised more agency to viewers (Horeck et al, 2018), adding a complex layer of motivations and gratifications to this historical trend. The technological affordances from high-speed Internet and streaming platforms create complex viewer experiences that were not possible for predigital audiences, and which complicate how television consumption is understood and practiced.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mixed outcomes of their research reflect binge-watching’s complexity: It has been linked to loneliness (Firger, 2015) and social bonding (Medina, 2017), addiction (Hsu, 2014) and empowerment (Perks, 2015), ambivalence (Steiner, 2017), and relaxation (Pittman and Sheehan, 2015). While viewers differentiate their experiences by content (prestige dramas vs. reality shows), motive (narrative engagement vs. relaxation), and attention (highly focused vs. multitasking), scholars have mostly focused on binge-watching in general (Castro et al, 2019; Hills, 2018; Horeck et al, 2018; Steiner and Xu, 2018). Given the popularity and complexity of streaming video consumption, we contend that discussing binge-watching as a singular activity is less productive than attempting to identify and analyze its distinguishable subtypes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%