1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0304-405x(97)00007-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On biases in tests of the expectations hypothesis of the term structure of interest rates

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

22
237
2

Year Published

1999
1999
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 328 publications
(265 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
22
237
2
Order By: Relevance
“…of the residuals after taking out the first n principal components. Standard deviations of residuals from using three principal components range from five to eleven basis points of annualized yields, which is roughly the same range as the measurement error described by Bekaert, Hodrick, and Marshall (1997).…”
Section: Principal Components Of Yieldsmentioning
confidence: 67%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…of the residuals after taking out the first n principal components. Standard deviations of residuals from using three principal components range from five to eleven basis points of annualized yields, which is roughly the same range as the measurement error described by Bekaert, Hodrick, and Marshall (1997).…”
Section: Principal Components Of Yieldsmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…The interpolation is inherently noisy. Bekaert, Hodrick, and Marshall (1997) estimate that the standard deviation of measurement error is in the range of seven to nine basis points of annualized yield for maturities of at least a year.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cross-country evidence about the EH is more mixed. In some countries like Germany, the EH seems to hold (n−1→n) up better than in the United States (Bekaert et al, 1997(Bekaert et al, , 2007Gerlach and Smets, 1997;Hardouvelis, 1994). Finally, the very short end of the yield curve seems to conform better with the EH (Longstaff, 2000b).…”
Section: Predictability Of Excess Returnsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Bekaert et al (1997) and Bekaert and Hodrick (2001) stress the importance of taking into account the small sample distributions of these R 2 s and other standard tests of the EH. Tests based on small sample distributions tend to make a weaker case against the EH.…”
Section: Predictability Of Excess Returnsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many authors argue that interest rates at di¤erent maturities move together because they are linked by the EH, and a number of studies have addressed the empirical validity of this theory. However, this literature, using a variety of tests and data, generally rejects the EH (e.g., Roll, 1970;Fama, 1984;Fama and Bliss, 1987;Frankel and Froot, 1987;Stambaugh, 1988;Froot, 1989;Campbell and Shiller, 1991;Bekaert, Hodrick, and Marshall, 1997;Bekaert and Hodrick, 2001;Clarida, Sarno, Taylor, and Valente, 2006;and Sarno, Thornton, and Valente, 2007). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%