2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0021-9045(02)00012-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On best uniform restricted range approximation in complex-valued continuous function spaces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
16
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, Rockafellar [46] gave many interesting examples showing that a wide spectrum of problems can be cast in terms of convex-composite functions (which are, in general, non-convex and non-continuous). Another "nonclosed" situation naturally arises when one considers the best restricted range approximation in complex valued continuous function space C(Q), which has been studied extensively (see for example [34,35,37,48,49] and reference therein), consisting of finding a best approximation to f ∈ C(Q) from P Ω = {p ∈ P : p(t) ∈ Ω t for all t ∈ Q}, where Q is a compact Hausdorff space, P is a finite-dimensional subspace of C(Q) and Ω = {Ω t : t ∈ Q} is a system of nonempty convex set in the complex plane C. As done in [34,35,37,48,49], each Ω t usually is expressed as a level set of some convex function, which is not lsc if Ω t is not closed. Thus, our approach can cover the case where Ω t is not necessarily closed.…”
Section: 2)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, Rockafellar [46] gave many interesting examples showing that a wide spectrum of problems can be cast in terms of convex-composite functions (which are, in general, non-convex and non-continuous). Another "nonclosed" situation naturally arises when one considers the best restricted range approximation in complex valued continuous function space C(Q), which has been studied extensively (see for example [34,35,37,48,49] and reference therein), consisting of finding a best approximation to f ∈ C(Q) from P Ω = {p ∈ P : p(t) ∈ Ω t for all t ∈ Q}, where Q is a compact Hausdorff space, P is a finite-dimensional subspace of C(Q) and Ω = {Ω t : t ∈ Q} is a system of nonempty convex set in the complex plane C. As done in [34,35,37,48,49], each Ω t usually is expressed as a level set of some convex function, which is not lsc if Ω t is not closed. Thus, our approach can cover the case where Ω t is not necessarily closed.…”
Section: 2)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus P Ω has Property U 2 and the proof of Theorem 4.2 is complete. The following corollary, which was obtained in [2][3][4][5] respectively under some stronger conditions, is now an immediate consequence of Theorem 4.1.…”
Section: Theorem 42 Consider the Following Statementsmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…One basic assumption in the study of the restricted range approximation problem of complexvalued continuous functions is that P Ω has an interior point or a strong interior point which are defined as follows, see [1][2][3][4][5][6] for details.…”
Section: Notions and Preliminary Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations