This paper proposes that affricates are composed of [-cont] and [+ cont] specifications which are unordered at underlying representation and throughout the phonological derivation, although they are ordered phonetically. Previous autosegmental treatments of the affricate, which include this ordering as part of underlying representation, can handle edge effects, which are cases where rules refer to only the adjacent value of [con@ But the ordered representation cannot account for anti-edge effects: those rules which involve the nonadjacent value of [cont]. Moreover, it predicts that ordering of the gestures is a possible phonological contrast, but this is incorrect, as no language has [+cont][-cont] single segments. As predicted by the unordered representation, all apparent cases of phonological edge effects can simply be stated as rules referring to a value of [cont]; all rules which show true edge effects occur after the values are phonetically ordered.* I would like to express my gratitude to John McCarthy, to whom I and this paper owe a not inconsiderable debt. Thanks also to